Utvärdering av den strukturella konnektiviteten hos värdväxter för pollinatörer i betongdjungeln : En jämförelse mellan generalist- och specialistarters möjligheter att sprida sig inom den urbana delen av Säters kommun, Sverige

Habitat loss and fragmentation significantly reduce global biodiversity by disrupting ecosystems and isolating populations, with pollinators being no exception. While generalist species adapt well to urban environments, thriving on diverse food sources, specialist species often face challenges due to their more specific habitat and dietary needs. This study explores the connectivity of the urban green spaces for local pollinators, considering their ecological preferences, in Säter Municipality, Sweden. A field inventory of six insect pollinator species’ host plants species and environmental preferences were conducted, complemented by a survey sent to local residents. The connectivity metrics Patch Cohesion Index (PCI) and Mean Proximity Index (MPI) were used and statistically tested in two ways: (1) a comparison of the structural connectivity of host plants and environmental preferences among all six insect species, using the MPI and PCI values as metrics, with the objective of evaluating whether any of the chosen species displayed a significant deviation in connectivity compared to therest, and (2) a comparison of the structural connectivity of host plants and environmental preferences, in which the MPI and PCI values of generalist species were compared to those of specialist species, to evaluate whether either group exhibited a significant difference. Hotspot maps for host plants and environmental preferences, as well as a coldspot map for physical barriers (buildings), were also generated. The results revealed no significant difference in structural connectivity between generalistand specialist species. However, the hotspot maps showed that the distribution of host plants and environmental preferences is uneven across the city. As no significant differences were found, the results suggest that urban green spaces can support both generalist and specialist species, highlighting their potential to foster biodiversity. The identification of hotspots in older, more vegetated neighborhoods underscores the importance of promoting plant diversity in both new and existing green spaces. Future research should include functional connectivity to better understand movement patterns and identify potential barriers. These findings emphasize the role of urban green spaces in supporting pollinators and ecosystem services, offering valuable insights for urban planning aimed at enhancing biodiversity.

Publication Details

Journal
Digitala vetenskapliga arkivet (Diva) (Karlstad University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utvärdering av den strukturella konnektiviteten hos värdväxter för pollinatörer i betongdjungeln : En jämförelse mellan generalist- och specialistarters möjligheter att sprida sig inom den urbana delen av Säters kommun, Sverige

Digitala vetenskapliga arkivet (Diva) (Karlstad University)
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Utvärdering av den strukturella konnektiviteten hos värdväxter för pollinatörer i betongdjungeln : En jämförelse mellan generalist- och specialistarters möjligheter att sprida sig inom den urbana delen av Säters kommun, Sverige

article en

Abstract

Habitat loss and fragmentation significantly reduce global biodiversity by disrupting ecosystems and isolating populations, with pollinators being no exception. While generalist species adapt well to urban environments, thriving on diverse food sources, specialist species often face challenges due to their more specific habitat and dietary needs. This study explores the connectivity of the urban green spaces for local pollinators, considering their ecological preferences, in Säter Municipality, Sweden. A field inventory of six insect pollinator species’ host plants species and environmental preferences were conducted, complemented by a survey sent to local residents. The connectivity metrics Patch Cohesion Index (PCI) and Mean Proximity Index (MPI) were used and statistically tested in two ways: (1) a comparison of the structural connectivity of host plants and environmental preferences among all six insect species, using the MPI and PCI values as metrics, with the objective of evaluating whether any of the chosen species displayed a significant deviation in connectivity compared to therest, and (2) a comparison of the structural connectivity of host plants and environmental preferences, in which the MPI and PCI values of generalist species were compared to those of specialist species, to evaluate whether either group exhibited a significant difference. Hotspot maps for host plants and environmental preferences, as well as a coldspot map for physical barriers (buildings), were also generated. The results revealed no significant difference in structural connectivity between generalistand specialist species. However, the hotspot maps showed that the distribution of host plants and environmental preferences is uneven across the city. As no significant differences were found, the results suggest that urban green spaces can support both generalist and specialist species, highlighting their potential to foster biodiversity. The identification of hotspots in older, more vegetated neighborhoods underscores the importance of promoting plant diversity in both new and existing green spaces. Future research should include functional connectivity to better understand movement patterns and identify potential barriers. These findings emphasize the role of urban green spaces in supporting pollinators and ecosystem services, offering valuable insights for urban planning aimed at enhancing biodiversity.

Digitala vetenskapliga arkivet (Diva) (Karlstad University)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.