When Recommendations Know You Too Well: Explanation Types, Privacy Concerns, and Eye-tracking Evidence in Personalized Systems

As AI-driven recommender systems become more persuasive, users are increasingly confronted with a trade-off between personalization and privacy. This study investigates how different explanation types in recommender systems influence users’ privacy concerns and trust, using both self-reported data and eye-tracking metrics. Drawing on the privacy calculus framework and trust theory, we employ a 2x5 factorial experiment involving 120 university students who interact with a course recommender system. The study introduces eye-tracking as a novel lens to assess cognitive responses to privacy-sensitive content within explanations. Our findings are expected to reveal how visual attention to personalized details correlates with privacy concerns and trust, thereby informing the design of transparent yet privacy-aware recommender systems. This research contributes to theory by extending the privacy calculus with cognitive measures and provides practical guidelines for explanation design in AI systems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Recommendations Know You Too Well: Explanation Types, Privacy Concerns, and Eye-tracking Evidence in Personalized Systems

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

When Recommendations Know You Too Well: Explanation Types, Privacy Concerns, and Eye-tracking Evidence in Personalized Systems

article en

Abstract

As AI-driven recommender systems become more persuasive, users are increasingly confronted with a trade-off between personalization and privacy. This study investigates how different explanation types in recommender systems influence users’ privacy concerns and trust, using both self-reported data and eye-tracking metrics. Drawing on the privacy calculus framework and trust theory, we employ a 2x5 factorial experiment involving 120 university students who interact with a course recommender system. The study introduces eye-tracking as a novel lens to assess cognitive responses to privacy-sensitive content within explanations. Our findings are expected to reveal how visual attention to personalized details correlates with privacy concerns and trust, thereby informing the design of transparent yet privacy-aware recommender systems. This research contributes to theory by extending the privacy calculus with cognitive measures and provides practical guidelines for explanation design in AI systems.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Temple College (US), Temple University, Japan (JP), Temple University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When Recommendations Know You Too Well: Explanation Types, Privacy Concerns, and Eye-tracking Evidence in Personalized Systems · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS