Steering Wheel Resistance Optimization in Steer-by-Wire: a Comparative Study

This thesis investigated two different approaches for determining steering wheel resistance in steer-by-wire systems: one based on a traditional algorithm and one using machine learning. The aim was to assess which method provided a more natural and user-preferred steering feel. Both methods used the same input parameters - steering angle, steering angle speed, and vehicle speed - and were developed, tested, and evaluated through multiple iterations. The traditional algorithm applied manually tuned coefficients, while the machine learning model was built using gradient boosting techniques. A simulator environment was used to apply and test the output from both methods. User feedback was collected after blind testing with ten drivers across three test rounds. Both qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed to evaluate realism, responsiveness, and overall satisfaction. The results showed that while both methods could be adjusted to produce acceptable outcomes, the machine learning model was generally preferred by users due to its smoother and more natural steering feel. This study contributed to a better understanding of how data-driven methods could be used to improve driver experience in emerging vehicle technologies.

Publication Details

Journal
Jonkoping University Library (Jönköping University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Steering Wheel Resistance Optimization in Steer-by-Wire: a Comparative Study

Jonkoping University Library (Jönköping University)
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
article

Steering Wheel Resistance Optimization in Steer-by-Wire: a Comparative Study

article en

Abstract

This thesis investigated two different approaches for determining steering wheel resistance in steer-by-wire systems: one based on a traditional algorithm and one using machine learning. The aim was to assess which method provided a more natural and user-preferred steering feel. Both methods used the same input parameters - steering angle, steering angle speed, and vehicle speed - and were developed, tested, and evaluated through multiple iterations. The traditional algorithm applied manually tuned coefficients, while the machine learning model was built using gradient boosting techniques. A simulator environment was used to apply and test the output from both methods. User feedback was collected after blind testing with ten drivers across three test rounds. Both qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed to evaluate realism, responsiveness, and overall satisfaction. The results showed that while both methods could be adjusted to produce acceptable outcomes, the machine learning model was generally preferred by users due to its smoother and more natural steering feel. This study contributed to a better understanding of how data-driven methods could be used to improve driver experience in emerging vehicle technologies.

Jonkoping University Library (Jönköping University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Steering Wheel Resistance Optimization in Steer-by-Wire: a Comparative Study · Jonkoping University Library (Jönköping University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS