Tutela de urgência na concessão de medicamentos

As a fundamental right, health demands promptness and immediate action, especially in cases that require swift and effective solutions. In this context, when an individual’s health requires urgent judicial intervention, provisional urgent protection is necessary, as it is considered the most appropriate legal mechanism for such cases, widely recognized by legal scholars and jurisprudence. The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of urgent legal protection in the judicialization of health-related issues. The research was primarily conducted through a bibliographical review, including books, legal doctrines, scientific articles, dissertations, legislation, and case law. Data collection was carried out in databases such as Google Scholar and Scielo, between March and April 2025, focusing on scientific works that discussed the topic. The results demonstrate that urgent legal protection, particularly in the form of anticipatory protection, is increasingly effective in the judicialization of health, especially in cases involving the provision of medication or medical treatments. Considering that delays may lead to the worsening of patients' health conditions or even pose a risk of death, this urgency is justified due to the impossibilityof waiting for the full process to unfold.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Public Health in Brazil
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tutela de urgência na concessão de medicamentos

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Public Health in Brazil
article

Tutela de urgência na concessão de medicamentos

article en

Abstract

As a fundamental right, health demands promptness and immediate action, especially in cases that require swift and effective solutions. In this context, when an individual’s health requires urgent judicial intervention, provisional urgent protection is necessary, as it is considered the most appropriate legal mechanism for such cases, widely recognized by legal scholars and jurisprudence. The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of urgent legal protection in the judicialization of health-related issues. The research was primarily conducted through a bibliographical review, including books, legal doctrines, scientific articles, dissertations, legislation, and case law. Data collection was carried out in databases such as Google Scholar and Scielo, between March and April 2025, focusing on scientific works that discussed the topic. The results demonstrate that urgent legal protection, particularly in the form of anticipatory protection, is increasingly effective in the judicialization of health, especially in cases involving the provision of medication or medical treatments. Considering that delays may lead to the worsening of patients' health conditions or even pose a risk of death, this urgency is justified due to the impossibilityof waiting for the full process to unfold.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Public Health in Brazil
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tutela de urgência na concessão de medicamentos · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS