A Transparent Decision-Making in the Digital Age

This paper examines how the use of algorithms in public decision-making affects administrative proceedings, particularly in relation to compliance with the principle of transparency. Algorithms, especially those based on machine learning, possess an inherent degree of opacity—linguistic, legal, and structural. Since these algorithms do not follow a predetermined logic but generate and create new pathways, they have often been described as black boxes, whose inner workings are difficult to discern. Given this fundamental opacity, which makes the functioning of algorithms potentially knowable but not always comprehensible, it becomes evident that the right of access to source code alone is insufficient to ensure an adequate level of transparency. Considering these premises, and taking into account judicial and scholarly perspectives, this paper explores how the concept of transparency—hypothetically compatible with the use of algorithms in public decision-making—evolves in response to these challenges.

Publication Details

Journal
IRIS - Institutional Research Information System (Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Transparent Decision-Making in the Digital Age

IRIS - Institutional Research Information System (Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A Transparent Decision-Making in the Digital Age

article en

Abstract

This paper examines how the use of algorithms in public decision-making affects administrative proceedings, particularly in relation to compliance with the principle of transparency. Algorithms, especially those based on machine learning, possess an inherent degree of opacity—linguistic, legal, and structural. Since these algorithms do not follow a predetermined logic but generate and create new pathways, they have often been described as black boxes, whose inner workings are difficult to discern. Given this fundamental opacity, which makes the functioning of algorithms potentially knowable but not always comprehensible, it becomes evident that the right of access to source code alone is insufficient to ensure an adequate level of transparency. Considering these premises, and taking into account judicial and scholarly perspectives, this paper explores how the concept of transparency—hypothetically compatible with the use of algorithms in public decision-making—evolves in response to these challenges.

IRIS - Institutional Research Information System (Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Transparent Decision-Making in the Digital Age · IRIS - Institutional Research Information System (Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS