Survey Evidence of Capital Budgeting Practices in Turkey

This study uses a survey approach to investigate the capital budgeting practices of non-financial Borsa Istanbul (BIST) 100 Index companies after Turkish authorities implemented major economic and structural reforms. The results reveal that Turkish managers strongly prefer net present value followed by payback period, internal rate of return, and accounting rate of return techniques to evaluate investment opportunities. They generally measure project risk individually by adjusting both the discount rate and cash flow and by mainly relying on sensitivity analysis followed by judgment. The findings illustrate that respondents estimate the weighted average cost of capital using market weights for assessing projects of average riskiness. They also indicate that their firms have a target debt ratio. Overall, the survey findings show that Turkish managers use systematic, analytical, and thorough investment appraisal approaches coupled with sound judgment after the Turkish capital markets underwent major reforms.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survey Evidence of Capital Budgeting Practices in Turkey

Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield)
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
article

Survey Evidence of Capital Budgeting Practices in Turkey

article en

Abstract

This study uses a survey approach to investigate the capital budgeting practices of non-financial Borsa Istanbul (BIST) 100 Index companies after Turkish authorities implemented major economic and structural reforms. The results reveal that Turkish managers strongly prefer net present value followed by payback period, internal rate of return, and accounting rate of return techniques to evaluate investment opportunities. They generally measure project risk individually by adjusting both the discount rate and cash flow and by mainly relying on sensitivity analysis followed by judgment. The findings illustrate that respondents estimate the weighted average cost of capital using market weights for assessing projects of average riskiness. They also indicate that their firms have a target debt ratio. Overall, the survey findings show that Turkish managers use systematic, analytical, and thorough investment appraisal approaches coupled with sound judgment after the Turkish capital markets underwent major reforms.

Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield)
University of Huddersfield (GB), American University (US), Yıldız Technical University (TR), Institute of Forest Productivity (IN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Survey Evidence of Capital Budgeting Practices in Turkey · Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS