Strengths and Weaknesses of Longitudinal Research in Information Systems: Preliminary Findings

Longitudinal research is a useful tool for information system (IS) researchers studying contemporary IS issues. Because longitudinal research is neither a monolithic concept nor a panacea, uncovering the strengths and weaknesses of past IS longitudinal studies could provide significant benefits to IS researchers wishing to use this approach in the future. To address this gap in the literature, we’re conducting a review of longitudinal studies published in eight prominent IS journals. Based on a preliminary analysis of a subset of this sample – 41 studies published in MIS Quarterly from 2011 to 2021 – this paper confirms the adequacy of IS longitudinal research at the micro-level but highlight deficiencies at the macro level. Most importantly, IS researchers are not using the approach to assess developmental change, historical change or causal effects and thus fail to take full advantage of the unique features of this approach.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strengths and Weaknesses of Longitudinal Research in Information Systems: Preliminary Findings

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Strengths and Weaknesses of Longitudinal Research in Information Systems: Preliminary Findings

article en

Abstract

Longitudinal research is a useful tool for information system (IS) researchers studying contemporary IS issues. Because longitudinal research is neither a monolithic concept nor a panacea, uncovering the strengths and weaknesses of past IS longitudinal studies could provide significant benefits to IS researchers wishing to use this approach in the future. To address this gap in the literature, we’re conducting a review of longitudinal studies published in eight prominent IS journals. Based on a preliminary analysis of a subset of this sample – 41 studies published in MIS Quarterly from 2011 to 2021 – this paper confirms the adequacy of IS longitudinal research at the micro-level but highlight deficiencies at the macro level. Most importantly, IS researchers are not using the approach to assess developmental change, historical change or causal effects and thus fail to take full advantage of the unique features of this approach.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Dulbecco Telethon Institute (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strengths and Weaknesses of Longitudinal Research in Information Systems: Preliminary Findings · Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS