Students' Democratic Competence : Opportunities and Limits for an Open Classroom Climate

In democracy and school research, many scholars have conducted quantitative studies and investigated which of the teachers’ teaching methods have positive effects on students’ democratic competence. Several of the studies demonstrate a positive correlation between an open classroom and students’ democratic competence. However, few researchers have conducted qualitative studies and investigated how the school context has effects on students’ democratic competence. This study investigates what opportunities and limits students think and experience for an open classroom climate in the Swedish, upper secondary school. This thesis aims to contribute new knowledge about how the school can promote and develop students’ democratic competence. To answer the research question, a combination of the two qualitative, research methods, focus groups and individual interviews are used. The results show that there are five mechanisms; knowledge, interest, trust, personality, and norms that can explain the opportunities and limits students think and experience for an open classroom in Swedish, upper secondary school. However, the students think and experience these mechanisms to varying degrees in different school contexts and class compositions. These findings contribute new knowledge about what similar or different opportunities and limits students may experience for an open classroom climate by identifying and analyzing which mechanisms can explain why an open classroom climate occurs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students' Democratic Competence : Opportunities and Limits for an Open Classroom Climate

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
article

Students' Democratic Competence : Opportunities and Limits for an Open Classroom Climate

article en

Abstract

In democracy and school research, many scholars have conducted quantitative studies and investigated which of the teachers’ teaching methods have positive effects on students’ democratic competence. Several of the studies demonstrate a positive correlation between an open classroom and students’ democratic competence. However, few researchers have conducted qualitative studies and investigated how the school context has effects on students’ democratic competence. This study investigates what opportunities and limits students think and experience for an open classroom climate in the Swedish, upper secondary school. This thesis aims to contribute new knowledge about how the school can promote and develop students’ democratic competence. To answer the research question, a combination of the two qualitative, research methods, focus groups and individual interviews are used. The results show that there are five mechanisms; knowledge, interest, trust, personality, and norms that can explain the opportunities and limits students think and experience for an open classroom in Swedish, upper secondary school. However, the students think and experience these mechanisms to varying degrees in different school contexts and class compositions. These findings contribute new knowledge about what similar or different opportunities and limits students may experience for an open classroom climate by identifying and analyzing which mechanisms can explain why an open classroom climate occurs.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Uppsala University (SE), Center for Autism and Related Disorders (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.