System vs Self: Correctional Officers’ Views on Recidivism

This study examined the extent to which correctional officers attribute recidivism to individual or systemic factors, specifically focusing on their self-reported levels of job satisfaction, role in their job, and stigmatized views toward those incarcerated. It was hypothesized that (1) correctional officers with lower job satisfaction would hold more stigmatized views of the inmates with whom they work, especially if they work in a punitive-focused prison, and (2) correctional officers with lower job satisfaction and higher levels of stigma would be more likely to view recidivism as an individual problem rather than a systemic issue. Findings indicate that correctional officers who reported lower job satisfaction held more stigmatizing views of incarcerated individuals, but that stigmatized views may not be driven by working in a punitive prison. Furthermore, correctional officers working in a more rehabilitative prison setting exhibited little to no stigmatizing attitudes and reported higher job satisfaction. Stigma alone did have a statistically significant relationship to views on recidivism, but recidivism was not found to be driven by these stigmatized views, nor did gender, race, and ethnicity have any significant relationship to recidivism. However, as role/job satisfaction increased, so did correctional officers’ views that recidivism stems from systemic issues. Ultimately, this study finds that recidivism is a complex topic that deserves further exploration if solutions are to be identified.

Publication Details

Journal
DigitalCommons@Linfield (Linfield College)
Published
2025-05-08
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

System vs Self: Correctional Officers’ Views on Recidivism

DigitalCommons@Linfield (Linfield College)
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

System vs Self: Correctional Officers’ Views on Recidivism

article en

Abstract

This study examined the extent to which correctional officers attribute recidivism to individual or systemic factors, specifically focusing on their self-reported levels of job satisfaction, role in their job, and stigmatized views toward those incarcerated. It was hypothesized that (1) correctional officers with lower job satisfaction would hold more stigmatized views of the inmates with whom they work, especially if they work in a punitive-focused prison, and (2) correctional officers with lower job satisfaction and higher levels of stigma would be more likely to view recidivism as an individual problem rather than a systemic issue. Findings indicate that correctional officers who reported lower job satisfaction held more stigmatizing views of incarcerated individuals, but that stigmatized views may not be driven by working in a punitive prison. Furthermore, correctional officers working in a more rehabilitative prison setting exhibited little to no stigmatizing attitudes and reported higher job satisfaction. Stigma alone did have a statistically significant relationship to views on recidivism, but recidivism was not found to be driven by these stigmatized views, nor did gender, race, and ethnicity have any significant relationship to recidivism. However, as role/job satisfaction increased, so did correctional officers’ views that recidivism stems from systemic issues. Ultimately, this study finds that recidivism is a complex topic that deserves further exploration if solutions are to be identified.

DigitalCommons@Linfield (Linfield College)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.