SS-11 Seeing red for the wrong reasons: Color priming and error detection.

If you are not typing, you will probably write in ink. Academic instructors use pens to grade assignments, students use them to take notes, and business professionals may use them to sign contracts and much more. Interestingly, research indicates that the color of ink significantly influences cognition and behavior. For example, studies have shown that writing in red ink is closely associated with negative feedback or failure. However, with the rise of technology, it is unclear whether these findings apply to today’s digital world, where people rely more on typing than writing in ink. The current study investigated whether exposing participants to a specific ink color would impact their performance on different cognitive tasks. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: green ink, red ink, or black ink. They were first asked to evaluate fictitious logos printed in green, red, or black ink using a pen of the same color as the logo. Then, participants were instructed to complete word stems, with some associated with failure or negative connotations. Lastly, participants were asked to find mistakes in a short essay and assign a final grade. It was hypothesized that giving participants red pens and exposing them to red logos would result in more negative word stems created, more errors found in the essay, and the lowest grades given. Conversely, giving participants green pens and exposing them to green logos would result in the fewest negative word stems, the fewest errors found in the essay, and the highest grades given. Findings may suggest that ink color can significantly influence cognitive performance and perception, which have important implications for optimizing feedback practices in education and professional settings.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Published
2025-04-11
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SS-11 Seeing red for the wrong reasons: Color priming and error detection.

Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Categorization, perception, and language
article

SS-11 Seeing red for the wrong reasons: Color priming and error detection.

article en

Abstract

If you are not typing, you will probably write in ink. Academic instructors use pens to grade assignments, students use them to take notes, and business professionals may use them to sign contracts and much more. Interestingly, research indicates that the color of ink significantly influences cognition and behavior. For example, studies have shown that writing in red ink is closely associated with negative feedback or failure. However, with the rise of technology, it is unclear whether these findings apply to today’s digital world, where people rely more on typing than writing in ink. The current study investigated whether exposing participants to a specific ink color would impact their performance on different cognitive tasks. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: green ink, red ink, or black ink. They were first asked to evaluate fictitious logos printed in green, red, or black ink using a pen of the same color as the logo. Then, participants were instructed to complete word stems, with some associated with failure or negative connotations. Lastly, participants were asked to find mistakes in a short essay and assign a final grade. It was hypothesized that giving participants red pens and exposing them to red logos would result in more negative word stems created, more errors found in the essay, and the lowest grades given. Conversely, giving participants green pens and exposing them to green logos would result in the fewest negative word stems, the fewest errors found in the essay, and the highest grades given. Findings may suggest that ink color can significantly influence cognitive performance and perception, which have important implications for optimizing feedback practices in education and professional settings.

Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Categorization, perception, and language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.