Small Cereal Grain Silage Producer Practices and Key Factors to Consider for Operations

The use of small grain silage to feed livestock has grown in popularity, although the more common source of silage is annual corn. A benefit of producing small cereal grain is double cropping, harvest a forage source in the spring prior to planting the summer annual crop. Although the cereal and corn silage processes are similar there are key differences within management decisions for producers. Objective one was to understand current management decisions from Nebraska producers pre- and post- fermentation surveys along with small cereal silage samples were analyzed. Some best management practices such as the dry matter (DM), DM density, and the rate of face removal in a 24-hour period, known as feedout were analyzed. Many of the producers were not able to achieve the target 30-35% DM for their forage, which is a best management practice. Generally, this was due to lack of time the forage was field dried. Consequently, forage ensiled at a DM% less than 30% resulted in an increased total digestible nutrient loss. For objective two, attendees of the silage conference in fall of 2022 received a survey regarding their management practices. In an analysis of the producers who fed beef cows compared to those who fed growing and finishing animals more centimeters of face removal were fed per 24-hour period by producers who fed growing and finishing animals. Most beef cow producers were not meeting the target feedout rate. Based on the stage of harvest, the research showed producers who harvest at boot are more concerned with the timing of harvest compared to those who harvest at soft dough. These producers showed no difference (P = 0.38, P = 0.77) for the quality or yield of the crop. These data show what educational information could help producers achieve optimal small cereal silage to feed their livestock. Factors such as moisture management, ways to optimize their feedout, and strategies to manage the timing of harvest and planting the next crop will allow producers to make better decisions about small cereal silage management. Advisor: Mary E. Drewnoski

Publication Details

Journal
Insecta mundi
Published
2025-05-02
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Small Cereal Grain Silage Producer Practices and Key Factors to Consider for Operations

Insecta mundi
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Small Cereal Grain Silage Producer Practices and Key Factors to Consider for Operations

article en

Abstract

The use of small grain silage to feed livestock has grown in popularity, although the more common source of silage is annual corn. A benefit of producing small cereal grain is double cropping, harvest a forage source in the spring prior to planting the summer annual crop. Although the cereal and corn silage processes are similar there are key differences within management decisions for producers. Objective one was to understand current management decisions from Nebraska producers pre- and post- fermentation surveys along with small cereal silage samples were analyzed. Some best management practices such as the dry matter (DM), DM density, and the rate of face removal in a 24-hour period, known as feedout were analyzed. Many of the producers were not able to achieve the target 30-35% DM for their forage, which is a best management practice. Generally, this was due to lack of time the forage was field dried. Consequently, forage ensiled at a DM% less than 30% resulted in an increased total digestible nutrient loss. For objective two, attendees of the silage conference in fall of 2022 received a survey regarding their management practices. In an analysis of the producers who fed beef cows compared to those who fed growing and finishing animals more centimeters of face removal were fed per 24-hour period by producers who fed growing and finishing animals. Most beef cow producers were not meeting the target feedout rate. Based on the stage of harvest, the research showed producers who harvest at boot are more concerned with the timing of harvest compared to those who harvest at soft dough. These producers showed no difference (P = 0.38, P = 0.77) for the quality or yield of the crop. These data show what educational information could help producers achieve optimal small cereal silage to feed their livestock. Factors such as moisture management, ways to optimize their feedout, and strategies to manage the timing of harvest and planting the next crop will allow producers to make better decisions about small cereal silage management. Advisor: Mary E. Drewnoski

Insecta mundi
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.