Spontaneous small ratio production in perceptual comparison task

How does the perceptual system compare quantities in the environment? Adult participants (n=47) were asked to judge the relative similarity or dissimilarity of two line lengths or brightnesses by making a mouse click along an unmarked horizontal bar. Despite receiving no instruction or feedback regarding how the stimuli should be compared, responding was remarkably consistent across observers and between modalities. A linear model based on the ratio of the smaller to the larger magnitude accounted for 92% and 93% of variance in average responses to line lengths and brightnesses (respectively) across 28 repeated stimulus pairs. A replication using 336 randomly generated pairs showed similar results (with 90% and 91% of variance accounted for). Decades of psychophysical research have delivered mixed results with respect to the relative importance of ratios – as opposed to differences – in perceptual comparison. The current data suggest ‘small ratios' (Morton et al., 2024) are the predominant comparative function.

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spontaneous small ratio production in perceptual comparison task

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Spontaneous small ratio production in perceptual comparison task

article en

Abstract

How does the perceptual system compare quantities in the environment? Adult participants (n=47) were asked to judge the relative similarity or dissimilarity of two line lengths or brightnesses by making a mouse click along an unmarked horizontal bar. Despite receiving no instruction or feedback regarding how the stimuli should be compared, responding was remarkably consistent across observers and between modalities. A linear model based on the ratio of the smaller to the larger magnitude accounted for 92% and 93% of variance in average responses to line lengths and brightnesses (respectively) across 28 repeated stimulus pairs. A replication using 336 randomly generated pairs showed similar results (with 90% and 91% of variance accounted for). Decades of psychophysical research have delivered mixed results with respect to the relative importance of ratios – as opposed to differences – in perceptual comparison. The current data suggest ‘small ratios' (Morton et al., 2024) are the predominant comparative function.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.