Social information eases discourse processing in human listeners

When using language, we talk often about other people. Given this skew in lived experience, we asked whether listeners process discourse with social topics more efficiently than non-social discourse. Thirty-nine participants listened to normed pairs of passages that differed only in three phrases to yield either a social or non-social topic. After listening, participants recalled all they could about the passage. While participants' recall accuracy across conditions was similar (p = .19), social discourse was recalled significantly faster (M = 103 s, SD = 52 s) than non-social discourse (M = 121 s, SD = 80 s, p = .01). Additionally, they relied less on verbatim memory for social than non-social discourse (p < .0001). This suggests that participants' experience with social language allows them to rely on existing social schema rather than verbatim memory. Our communicative system is sensitive to even the tiniest bit of gossip in the input.

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social information eases discourse processing in human listeners

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Social information eases discourse processing in human listeners

article en

Abstract

When using language, we talk often about other people. Given this skew in lived experience, we asked whether listeners process discourse with social topics more efficiently than non-social discourse. Thirty-nine participants listened to normed pairs of passages that differed only in three phrases to yield either a social or non-social topic. After listening, participants recalled all they could about the passage. While participants' recall accuracy across conditions was similar (p = .19), social discourse was recalled significantly faster (M = 103 s, SD = 52 s) than non-social discourse (M = 121 s, SD = 80 s, p = .01). Additionally, they relied less on verbatim memory for social than non-social discourse (p < .0001). This suggests that participants' experience with social language allows them to rely on existing social schema rather than verbatim memory. Our communicative system is sensitive to even the tiniest bit of gossip in the input.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Social information eases discourse processing in human listeners · eScholarship (California Digital Library) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS