Social Media Addiction and the Digital Services Act: Mitigation Measures or Missed Opportunities? An Intra-Active Critique

This paper critiques the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) for enacting a mechanistic conception of platform addiction—one that treats harm as isolated and isolatable or traceable to specific interface features and addressable through transparency tools and user-facing toggles. Drawing on Karen Barad’s concepts of intra-action and diffraction, the paper reframes addiction not as a bounded phenomenon but as a relatant: an emergent, relational process constituted through neurological, psychosocial, algorithmic, and infrastructural entanglements. Through analysis of four dominant models of addiction and the predictive logic of recommender systems, it shows that the DSA misapprehends the ontological structure of the harm it seeks to regulate. The paper proposes that age-based restrictions may offer a more materially attuned intervention, but warns—through a diffractive ethics—against imagining such measures as ontologically neutral. Regulation, it argues, should be rethought not as external control, but as an ongoing participant in the becoming of what it aims to govern.

Publication Details

Journal
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Published
2025-05-06
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Media Addiction and the Digital Services Act: Mitigation Measures or Missed Opportunities? An Intra-Active Critique

Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

Social Media Addiction and the Digital Services Act: Mitigation Measures or Missed Opportunities? An Intra-Active Critique

article en

Abstract

This paper critiques the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA) for enacting a mechanistic conception of platform addiction—one that treats harm as isolated and isolatable or traceable to specific interface features and addressable through transparency tools and user-facing toggles. Drawing on Karen Barad’s concepts of intra-action and diffraction, the paper reframes addiction not as a bounded phenomenon but as a relatant: an emergent, relational process constituted through neurological, psychosocial, algorithmic, and infrastructural entanglements. Through analysis of four dominant models of addiction and the predictive logic of recommender systems, it shows that the DSA misapprehends the ontological structure of the harm it seeks to regulate. The paper proposes that age-based restrictions may offer a more materially attuned intervention, but warns—through a diffractive ethics—against imagining such measures as ontologically neutral. Regulation, it argues, should be rethought not as external control, but as an ongoing participant in the becoming of what it aims to govern.

Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.