Social Argumentation Systems

While a lot of research has been conducted on understanding and formalising the interplay of arguments within the context of Computational Argumentation, this research is not fully applicable to the types of arguments that populate the Social Web. In that context, arguments usually have the form of comments, opinions or reviews, and are the main ingredients of online discussion forums, social networks, online rating and review sites, debate portals and other online communities-the electronic version of word-of-mouth communication. As a result, voting and other forms of reaction to the provided comments or arguments (other than just “attacks”) are allowed, features that are not normally considered in the classical literature on Computational Argumentation. In this chapter, we study extensions of argumentation frameworks that have been proposed to describe and understand the more complex types of interactions among arguments that can be found in the Social Web, and present the current state-of-the-art, as well as open problems.

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social Argumentation Systems

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
article

Social Argumentation Systems

article en

Abstract

While a lot of research has been conducted on understanding and formalising the interplay of arguments within the context of Computational Argumentation, this research is not fully applicable to the types of arguments that populate the Social Web. In that context, arguments usually have the form of comments, opinions or reviews, and are the main ingredients of online discussion forums, social networks, online rating and review sites, debate portals and other online communities-the electronic version of word-of-mouth communication. As a result, voting and other forms of reaction to the provided comments or arguments (other than just “attacks”) are allowed, features that are not normally considered in the classical literature on Computational Argumentation. In this chapter, we study extensions of argumentation frameworks that have been proposed to describe and understand the more complex types of interactions among arguments that can be found in the Social Web, and present the current state-of-the-art, as well as open problems.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.