Robotic Process Automation inom offentlig sektor

This study examines which criteria public officials involved in the development and implementation of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) in the public sector believe should be considered when selecting processes for automation, and how these criteria align with the theoretical Process Characteristics Evaluation Framework (PCEF). The public sector is increasingly interested in automation, but existing frameworks are often developed for private organizations, which may limit their relevance. The study was carried out as a single case study at a Swedish government agency and was based on qualitative data from five interviews. The empirical material was analyzed using thematic analysis, with theory-driven and data-driven themes identified through an abductive approach. The results show that nine of the twelve PCEF criteria align with the empirical findings, whereas the criteria for error rate, frequency, and resources were questioned. Two new themes emerged: value creation as a driving force and partial automation coupled with the need for human control. The PCEF is largely applicable in the public sector, but supplements are needed to capture its specific requirements.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Robotic Process Automation Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic Process Automation inom offentlig sektor

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Robotic Process Automation Applications
article

Robotic Process Automation inom offentlig sektor

article en

Abstract

This study examines which criteria public officials involved in the development and implementation of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) in the public sector believe should be considered when selecting processes for automation, and how these criteria align with the theoretical Process Characteristics Evaluation Framework (PCEF). The public sector is increasingly interested in automation, but existing frameworks are often developed for private organizations, which may limit their relevance. The study was carried out as a single case study at a Swedish government agency and was based on qualitative data from five interviews. The empirical material was analyzed using thematic analysis, with theory-driven and data-driven themes identified through an abductive approach. The results show that nine of the twelve PCEF criteria align with the empirical findings, whereas the criteria for error rate, frequency, and resources were questioned. Two new themes emerged: value creation as a driving force and partial automation coupled with the need for human control. The PCEF is largely applicable in the public sector, but supplements are needed to capture its specific requirements.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Robotic Process Automation Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Robotic Process Automation inom offentlig sektor · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS