The Sexual Violence Epidemic vs. the Uniform Code of Military Justice & Feres Doctrine

Less than 0.009% of reported assaults result in a conviction for a sex offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, raising serious concerns about the epidemic of sexual violence in the military. Despite this, more than 99% of allegations of sexual assault in the military are verified. The Uniform Code of Military Justice has been modified by recent congressional legislation but these modifications fall short of providing justice due to the prosecutorial discretion afforded to non-lawyer commanders. Moreover, service members are unable to bring claims of sexual violence to civilian courts when the military fails them due to the Supreme Court's unwillingness to reverse the horror that has been caused by the Feres doctrine. This Article proposes that a combined approach must be utilized, removing sexual harassment from commanders' discretion and amending the Federal Tort Claims Act to allow sexual violence claims to proceed on the merits without analysis under Feres.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sexual Violence Epidemic vs. the Uniform Code of Military Justice & Feres Doctrine

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
article

The Sexual Violence Epidemic vs. the Uniform Code of Military Justice & Feres Doctrine

article en

Abstract

Less than 0.009% of reported assaults result in a conviction for a sex offense under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, raising serious concerns about the epidemic of sexual violence in the military. Despite this, more than 99% of allegations of sexual assault in the military are verified. The Uniform Code of Military Justice has been modified by recent congressional legislation but these modifications fall short of providing justice due to the prosecutorial discretion afforded to non-lawyer commanders. Moreover, service members are unable to bring claims of sexual violence to civilian courts when the military fails them due to the Supreme Court's unwillingness to reverse the horror that has been caused by the Feres doctrine. This Article proposes that a combined approach must be utilized, removing sexual harassment from commanders' discretion and amending the Federal Tort Claims Act to allow sexual violence claims to proceed on the merits without analysis under Feres.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Legal Systems and Judicial Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.