Soil Response to Chemical Applications in Different Areas on a Golf Course

Soil Response to Chemical Applications in Different Areas on a Golf Course Drew Richardson, Kamaren Cunningham, Iin Handayani, Caleb Unverfehrt Hutson School of Agriculture, Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky, USA ABSTRACT Golf courses apply large amounts of chemicals every year to control pests, weeds, fungi, and nutrient levels. Disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were taken from four spots from the fairways, rough, and trees each at around 7.6 cm deep. The samples were collected from Miller Memorial Golf Course in Murray, KY and Paris Landing State Park in Buchannan, TN. The rough and tree areas have no chemicals that have been applied to them at Paris Landing; Miller Memorial sprays the rough for nutsedge. Miller Memorial has Loring Silt Loam and Brandon Silt Loam soils; Paris Landing State Park has Providence Silt Loam and Smithdale Silty Clay/Loam soils. The data processed looks as expected from the different soil types present in the locations. Miller Memorial’s rough showed lower SOM (4.08%) than Paris Landing (4.50%). In conclusion, applications in the rough decreased organic matter levels over time. Miller Memorial’s fairway pH was at the target pH (7.03), while the rough and trees ranged from 7.23-7.25. The soil pH in the fairway at Paris Landing (7.05) was similar to Miller Memorial. The surrounding ground had a soil pH of 7.18 to 7.20. The highest bulk density was found in the Paris Landing fairway (1.43 g/cm^3). The difference between the data from fairways/rough/trees determined how these applications influenced the overall soil health. This research will show golf course superintendents the needs for their soils’ overall health, promote proper turf management, and explain how the application of chemicals influences soil characteristics. Keywords: Compaction, soil health, soil organic matter, soil pH, turf management

Publication Details

Journal
Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Published
2024-11-04
Primary Topic
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Soil Response to Chemical Applications in Different Areas on a Golf Course

Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
article

Soil Response to Chemical Applications in Different Areas on a Golf Course

article en

Abstract

Soil Response to Chemical Applications in Different Areas on a Golf Course Drew Richardson, Kamaren Cunningham, Iin Handayani, Caleb Unverfehrt Hutson School of Agriculture, Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky, USA ABSTRACT Golf courses apply large amounts of chemicals every year to control pests, weeds, fungi, and nutrient levels. Disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were taken from four spots from the fairways, rough, and trees each at around 7.6 cm deep. The samples were collected from Miller Memorial Golf Course in Murray, KY and Paris Landing State Park in Buchannan, TN. The rough and tree areas have no chemicals that have been applied to them at Paris Landing; Miller Memorial sprays the rough for nutsedge. Miller Memorial has Loring Silt Loam and Brandon Silt Loam soils; Paris Landing State Park has Providence Silt Loam and Smithdale Silty Clay/Loam soils. The data processed looks as expected from the different soil types present in the locations. Miller Memorial’s rough showed lower SOM (4.08%) than Paris Landing (4.50%). In conclusion, applications in the rough decreased organic matter levels over time. Miller Memorial’s fairway pH was at the target pH (7.03), while the rough and trees ranged from 7.23-7.25. The soil pH in the fairway at Paris Landing (7.05) was similar to Miller Memorial. The surrounding ground had a soil pH of 7.18 to 7.20. The highest bulk density was found in the Paris Landing fairway (1.43 g/cm^3). The difference between the data from fairways/rough/trees determined how these applications influenced the overall soil health. This research will show golf course superintendents the needs for their soils’ overall health, promote proper turf management, and explain how the application of chemicals influences soil characteristics. Keywords: Compaction, soil health, soil organic matter, soil pH, turf management

Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Soil Response to Chemical Applications in Different Areas on a Golf Course · Murray State's Digital Commons (Murray State University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS