(Re-)Learning to Relate to the more than human: some conceptual, affective and practice-based perspectives

The lack of concerted action by the majority of the population in the face of the global ecological catastrophe compels us to ponder the deeper cause of inaction: a troubled relationship with the more-than-human world.Redressing this relationship and (re-)learning to relate to the more-than-human calls for a critical analysis of current modes of relation, as well as a quest for different, more ecological (ethical, responsible, reciprocal, affective) ways to relate.This article engages with these two processes through three interrelated perspectives: conceptual, affective, and practice-based.On a conceptual level, I propose to rethink how we relate to the more-than-human through the lenses of kinship.I suggest that, when these reformed relationalities are imbued with affect and ecological awareness (through the affective and relational perspectives of biophilia and correspondence), specific forms of attention emerge, as we are no longer dispassionate observers but affectively engaged participants.I call this 'empathetic attention'.I explore the ways in which these conceptual stances and affective intensities can come together in enactments and practice-such as mourning ceremonies for ecological losses.I argue that these enactments constitute 'ecological practices' as they substantiate relationalities based on care, and more sustainable ways of thinking, feeling, and acting towards the more-than-human world.

Publication Details

Journal
Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(Re-)Learning to Relate to the more than human: some conceptual, affective and practice-based perspectives

Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

(Re-)Learning to Relate to the more than human: some conceptual, affective and practice-based perspectives

article en

Abstract

The lack of concerted action by the majority of the population in the face of the global ecological catastrophe compels us to ponder the deeper cause of inaction: a troubled relationship with the more-than-human world.Redressing this relationship and (re-)learning to relate to the more-than-human calls for a critical analysis of current modes of relation, as well as a quest for different, more ecological (ethical, responsible, reciprocal, affective) ways to relate.This article engages with these two processes through three interrelated perspectives: conceptual, affective, and practice-based.On a conceptual level, I propose to rethink how we relate to the more-than-human through the lenses of kinship.I suggest that, when these reformed relationalities are imbued with affect and ecological awareness (through the affective and relational perspectives of biophilia and correspondence), specific forms of attention emerge, as we are no longer dispassionate observers but affectively engaged participants.I call this 'empathetic attention'.I explore the ways in which these conceptual stances and affective intensities can come together in enactments and practice-such as mourning ceremonies for ecological losses.I argue that these enactments constitute 'ecological practices' as they substantiate relationalities based on care, and more sustainable ways of thinking, feeling, and acting towards the more-than-human world.

Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.