Reproductive choice rights in the system of new bioethical human rights

This article presents an in-depth examination of challenges facing the practical implementation of reproductive rights in contemporary society. Research confirms that reproductive rights constitute a fundamental component of fourth-generation human rights, characterized by autonomous choice of legally permitted behaviors and personal self-determination. The legal framework governing reproductive rights in Ukraine includes constitutional provisions, Civil and Family Codes, and healthcare legislation. However, the analysis reveals a significant legislative gap - the absence of a unified regulatory document comprehensively addressing reproductive rights, resulting in numerous legal inconsistencies. The study categorizes reproductive rights into positive rights (such as artificial insemination access) and negative rights (including sterilization and abortion services). Key regulatory issues surrounding assisted reproductive technologies are identified, particularly the lack of clear statutory definitions for critical terms like “infertility,” “embryo,” “surrogacy,” and “genetic parents,” alongside inadequate age restrictions for ART procedures and ambiguous embryo status regulations. International jurisprudence on sterilization is examined, with specific reference to the V.C. v. Slovakia case, which emphasized the paramount importance of obtaining informed patient consent. The research highlights the problematic imbalance in spousal rights regarding sterilization and abortion decisions, advocating for mandatory consent requirements when procedures could permanently affect a couple’s procreative capacity. Particular scholarly attention focuses on the embryo’s evolving legal position within reproductive rights discourse, especially relevant given advancing reproductive technologies. The article explores ethical and legal tensions between embryonic right to life considerations and individual reproductive freedoms. The conclusion offers specific recommendations for strengthening reproductive rights legislation in Ukraine.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Published
2025-06-06
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproductive choice rights in the system of new bioethical human rights

Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Reproductive choice rights in the system of new bioethical human rights

article en

Abstract

This article presents an in-depth examination of challenges facing the practical implementation of reproductive rights in contemporary society. Research confirms that reproductive rights constitute a fundamental component of fourth-generation human rights, characterized by autonomous choice of legally permitted behaviors and personal self-determination. The legal framework governing reproductive rights in Ukraine includes constitutional provisions, Civil and Family Codes, and healthcare legislation. However, the analysis reveals a significant legislative gap - the absence of a unified regulatory document comprehensively addressing reproductive rights, resulting in numerous legal inconsistencies. The study categorizes reproductive rights into positive rights (such as artificial insemination access) and negative rights (including sterilization and abortion services). Key regulatory issues surrounding assisted reproductive technologies are identified, particularly the lack of clear statutory definitions for critical terms like “infertility,” “embryo,” “surrogacy,” and “genetic parents,” alongside inadequate age restrictions for ART procedures and ambiguous embryo status regulations. International jurisprudence on sterilization is examined, with specific reference to the V.C. v. Slovakia case, which emphasized the paramount importance of obtaining informed patient consent. The research highlights the problematic imbalance in spousal rights regarding sterilization and abortion decisions, advocating for mandatory consent requirements when procedures could permanently affect a couple’s procreative capacity. Particular scholarly attention focuses on the embryo’s evolving legal position within reproductive rights discourse, especially relevant given advancing reproductive technologies. The article explores ethical and legal tensions between embryonic right to life considerations and individual reproductive freedoms. The conclusion offers specific recommendations for strengthening reproductive rights legislation in Ukraine.

Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Tashkent State University of Law (UZ), Uzhhorod National University (UA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reproductive choice rights in the system of new bioethical human rights · Scientific periodicals of Ukraine (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS