Preliminary Evaluation of Clinical and Non-Clinical Outcome Metrics in Patient Satisfaction After Implantation of a Non-Constant Aberration-Correcting Monofocal IOL

Steven C Schallhorn,1– 3 David Teenan,2 Jan A Venter,2 Julie M Schallhorn,1,4 Stephen J Hannan2 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; 2Optical Express, Glasgow, UK; 3Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA, USA; 4F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USACorrespondence: Steven C Schallhorn, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, 490 Illinois St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA, Tel +1-858-455-6800, Email [email protected]: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes after implantation of a non-constant aberration-correcting monofocal IOL and explore factors affecting postoperative satisfaction with vision.Methods: This retrospective study comprised patients who underwent cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of CT LUCIA 621P IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Factors affecting postoperative satisfaction with vision were evaluated, including patient demographics, clinical and non-clinical variables (visual acuities, adverse events, ocular comorbidities, general health, depression scores, personality types), and other patient-reported outcomes (visual phenomena, dry eye). Questionnaires were used to assess patient-reported visual outcomes, depression, and personality types. The outcomes of the last available clinical visit were evaluated.Results: A total of 97 patients were included, of whom 63.9% reported to be very satisfied and 30.9% were satisfied with postoperative vision. Only three patients were dissatisfied, and the reasons were mostly related to their postoperative clinical findings. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the patient’s age and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity were significant predictors of postoperative satisfaction. Some non-clinical and clinical variables were signaling potential trends in satisfaction, but a larger cohort of patients would be required to explore them.Conclusion: Satisfaction of cataract patients implanted with a monofocal IOL remains high. When evaluating postoperative satisfaction, non-clinical factors and interactions with other patient-reported outcomes (visual phenomena or dry eye) should not be underestimated.Keywords: monofocal IOL, non-constant aberration-correcting design, patient satisfaction

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preliminary Evaluation of Clinical and Non-Clinical Outcome Metrics in Patient Satisfaction After Implantation of a Non-Constant Aberration-Correcting Monofocal IOL

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Preliminary Evaluation of Clinical and Non-Clinical Outcome Metrics in Patient Satisfaction After Implantation of a Non-Constant Aberration-Correcting Monofocal IOL

article en

Abstract

Steven C Schallhorn,1– 3 David Teenan,2 Jan A Venter,2 Julie M Schallhorn,1,4 Stephen J Hannan2 1Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA; 2Optical Express, Glasgow, UK; 3Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA, USA; 4F.I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USACorrespondence: Steven C Schallhorn, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, 490 Illinois St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA, Tel +1-858-455-6800, Email [email protected]: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes after implantation of a non-constant aberration-correcting monofocal IOL and explore factors affecting postoperative satisfaction with vision.Methods: This retrospective study comprised patients who underwent cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of CT LUCIA 621P IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). Factors affecting postoperative satisfaction with vision were evaluated, including patient demographics, clinical and non-clinical variables (visual acuities, adverse events, ocular comorbidities, general health, depression scores, personality types), and other patient-reported outcomes (visual phenomena, dry eye). Questionnaires were used to assess patient-reported visual outcomes, depression, and personality types. The outcomes of the last available clinical visit were evaluated.Results: A total of 97 patients were included, of whom 63.9% reported to be very satisfied and 30.9% were satisfied with postoperative vision. Only three patients were dissatisfied, and the reasons were mostly related to their postoperative clinical findings. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the patient’s age and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity were significant predictors of postoperative satisfaction. Some non-clinical and clinical variables were signaling potential trends in satisfaction, but a larger cohort of patients would be required to explore them.Conclusion: Satisfaction of cataract patients implanted with a monofocal IOL remains high. When evaluating postoperative satisfaction, non-clinical factors and interactions with other patient-reported outcomes (visual phenomena or dry eye) should not be underestimated.Keywords: monofocal IOL, non-constant aberration-correcting design, patient satisfaction

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.