Perceptions of Fairness in Machine Learning-Driven Hiring at the Federal Board of Revenue in Pakistan

Machine learning (ML) in public-sector hiring at Pakistan’s Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) enhances efficiency but risks perpetuating biases, challenging constitutional quotas for equitable representation. This study explores candidates’ perceptions of fairness in ML-driven hiring and their alignment with Pakistan’s mandates for gender (10%) and regional (6% Balochistan) quotas. Using a survey of 163 candidates, analyzed with chi-square tests, regression analysis, and descriptive statistics, we found no significant associations between gender or region and perceived fairness, despite audits revealing Balochistan’s 27% underrepresentation and 15% higher rejection rates for women. Regional disparities in perceived quota alignment were notable, though data limitations reduced reliability. Low awareness of ML use (42.3% uninformed) suggests procedural opacity shapes neutral perceptions, masking inequities. We recommend quota-aware algorithm audits, transparent communication, and stakeholder engagement to align ML systems with constitutional equity goals, fostering trust in automated hiring. This study highlights the need to bridge technical fairness with legal mandates in public-sector recruitment.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of Fairness in Machine Learning-Driven Hiring at the Federal Board of Revenue in Pakistan

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Perceptions of Fairness in Machine Learning-Driven Hiring at the Federal Board of Revenue in Pakistan

article en

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) in public-sector hiring at Pakistan’s Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) enhances efficiency but risks perpetuating biases, challenging constitutional quotas for equitable representation. This study explores candidates’ perceptions of fairness in ML-driven hiring and their alignment with Pakistan’s mandates for gender (10%) and regional (6% Balochistan) quotas. Using a survey of 163 candidates, analyzed with chi-square tests, regression analysis, and descriptive statistics, we found no significant associations between gender or region and perceived fairness, despite audits revealing Balochistan’s 27% underrepresentation and 15% higher rejection rates for women. Regional disparities in perceived quota alignment were notable, though data limitations reduced reliability. Low awareness of ML use (42.3% uninformed) suggests procedural opacity shapes neutral perceptions, masking inequities. We recommend quota-aware algorithm audits, transparent communication, and stakeholder engagement to align ML systems with constitutional equity goals, fostering trust in automated hiring. This study highlights the need to bridge technical fairness with legal mandates in public-sector recruitment.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.