Parenting Under Siege: Reckoning with Coercive Control

Coercive control is a pervasive form of domestic violence in which one partner engages in a prolonged and multifaceted campaign of abuse in order to gain and maintain dominance over the other partner. While some coercively controlling partners employ physical violence to ensure compliance with their demands, others use exclusively non-violent tactics. In co-parenting relationships, coercive control not only inflicts severe harm on the targeted parent but also affects children as co-victims of both direct and indirect abuse. As a result, co-victim children suffer significant emotional, developmental, and social harm, and adverse health outcomes, even in the absence of physical abuse. Yet legal frameworks addressing domestic violence typically focus on discrete acts of physical violence, adhering to what scholars term the “violent incident model.” Recognizing this gap, several states have introduced legislation that would expand state law domestic violence definitions to include coercive control, both in criminal and family law contexts. This Article critiques these trending legislative reforms, arguing that such expansions are unlikely to meaningfully benefit survivors and may instead be weaponized by abusive partners, resulting in criminal prosecution, loss of custody of children, and other negative consequences for survivors of coercive control who are unjustly swept up in broad statutory language. Systemic flaws in both the criminal and family law systems make women of color and other marginalized victims particularly vulnerable to this risk of being falsely classified as perpetrators of coercive control. This Article recommends against these broad definitional changes, instead proposing a more nuanced approach combining training initiatives with legislative reforms that expand key legal protections to victims of coercive control. The Article concludes by noting that more comprehensive solutions will remain out of reach without a fundamental shift in societal values which challenges the deeply patriarchal social norms of abuse and victimhood that entrap and endanger coercive control victims and their children.

Publication Details

Journal
OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Medical and Biological Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parenting Under Siege: Reckoning with Coercive Control

OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)
Medical and Biological Sciences
article

Parenting Under Siege: Reckoning with Coercive Control

article en

Abstract

Coercive control is a pervasive form of domestic violence in which one partner engages in a prolonged and multifaceted campaign of abuse in order to gain and maintain dominance over the other partner. While some coercively controlling partners employ physical violence to ensure compliance with their demands, others use exclusively non-violent tactics. In co-parenting relationships, coercive control not only inflicts severe harm on the targeted parent but also affects children as co-victims of both direct and indirect abuse. As a result, co-victim children suffer significant emotional, developmental, and social harm, and adverse health outcomes, even in the absence of physical abuse. Yet legal frameworks addressing domestic violence typically focus on discrete acts of physical violence, adhering to what scholars term the “violent incident model.” Recognizing this gap, several states have introduced legislation that would expand state law domestic violence definitions to include coercive control, both in criminal and family law contexts. This Article critiques these trending legislative reforms, arguing that such expansions are unlikely to meaningfully benefit survivors and may instead be weaponized by abusive partners, resulting in criminal prosecution, loss of custody of children, and other negative consequences for survivors of coercive control who are unjustly swept up in broad statutory language. Systemic flaws in both the criminal and family law systems make women of color and other marginalized victims particularly vulnerable to this risk of being falsely classified as perpetrators of coercive control. This Article recommends against these broad definitional changes, instead proposing a more nuanced approach combining training initiatives with legislative reforms that expand key legal protections to victims of coercive control. The Article concludes by noting that more comprehensive solutions will remain out of reach without a fundamental shift in societal values which challenges the deeply patriarchal social norms of abuse and victimhood that entrap and endanger coercive control victims and their children.

OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Medical and Biological Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parenting Under Siege: Reckoning with Coercive Control · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS