Objektdetektering med AI för projektbaserad tillverkning : RF-DETR vs. YOLOv12

In project-based manufacturing, efficiently organizing and reusing visual material is critical for communication and knowledge retention. This thesis explores whether fine-tuned object detection models—YOLOv12 and RF-DETR—can automate metadata tagging for a Swedish furniture SME that lacks a Digital Asset Management (DAM) system and relies on Dropbox. A Design Science Research (DSR) approach was used. Both models were trained on a 33-class dataset with 9,447 annotated images (including augmentation). YOLOv12 is convolutional and optimized for speed; RF-DETR is transformer-based. RF-DETR showed slightly higher accuracy ([email protected]: 0.82 vs. 0.79), while YOLOv12 was faster (36s vs. 80s per 40-image batch). Both outperformed manual tagging in speed, though occlusion and ambiguity remained challenging in comparison to human-level accuracy. Beyond benchmarking, the study identifies key organizational enablers and constraints for AI adoption, including the need for semantic consistency, responsibility for model maintenance, and alignment with informal practices. The company reflects characteristics of Mintzberg’s Simple Structure—centralized decision-making and informal coordination—yet displays early signs of systematization and potentially more structured operational roles. In this context, the proposed pipeline could enhance DAM capabilities by improving searchability, reducing manual overhead, and enabling cross-project reuse. The thesis contributes both a replicable pipeline and practical insights for implementing sustainable, domain-specific AI in small organizations lacking dedicated AI roles.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objektdetektering med AI för projektbaserad tillverkning : RF-DETR vs. YOLOv12

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Knowledge Management and Technology
article

Objektdetektering med AI för projektbaserad tillverkning : RF-DETR vs. YOLOv12

article en

Abstract

In project-based manufacturing, efficiently organizing and reusing visual material is critical for communication and knowledge retention. This thesis explores whether fine-tuned object detection models—YOLOv12 and RF-DETR—can automate metadata tagging for a Swedish furniture SME that lacks a Digital Asset Management (DAM) system and relies on Dropbox. A Design Science Research (DSR) approach was used. Both models were trained on a 33-class dataset with 9,447 annotated images (including augmentation). YOLOv12 is convolutional and optimized for speed; RF-DETR is transformer-based. RF-DETR showed slightly higher accuracy ([email protected]: 0.82 vs. 0.79), while YOLOv12 was faster (36s vs. 80s per 40-image batch). Both outperformed manual tagging in speed, though occlusion and ambiguity remained challenging in comparison to human-level accuracy. Beyond benchmarking, the study identifies key organizational enablers and constraints for AI adoption, including the need for semantic consistency, responsibility for model maintenance, and alignment with informal practices. The company reflects characteristics of Mintzberg’s Simple Structure—centralized decision-making and informal coordination—yet displays early signs of systematization and potentially more structured operational roles. In this context, the proposed pipeline could enhance DAM capabilities by improving searchability, reducing manual overhead, and enabling cross-project reuse. The thesis contributes both a replicable pipeline and practical insights for implementing sustainable, domain-specific AI in small organizations lacking dedicated AI roles.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Knowledge Management and Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.