MORE EASILY FACILITATING INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT: THE IMPACTS OF SENATE BILL 43 ON THE INTERSECTION OF MENTAL ILLNESS AND HOMELESSNESS IN CALIFORNIA

Mental health and homelessness are two of the most prominent matters affecting California. The Legislature has attempted to combat the issues stemming from these concerns through various forms of legislation. Despite legislative efforts, the intersection between mental illness and homelessness continues to present further challenges. California Senate Bill 43 (SB-43) sets out to address the mental health crisis by modernizing California’s laws handling behavioral health, specifically for individuals living on the streets. This Note analyzes the impact of SB-43 on California’s mental health system and individuals. SB-43 expands the legal definition of “gravely disabled” to include individuals who fit the Bill’s requirements for mental health and severe substance use disorders. Additionally, SB-43 provides that expert witness statements in medical records will not be made inadmissible in court under the hearsay rule. Lastly, the Bill increases the reporting requirements to align with the new definition of “gravely disabled” to provide more clarity within the system. SB-43 poses significant problems that undermine its goals of combating rising rates of mental health issues, substance abuse, and homelessness. SB-43 risks creating a conservatorship pipeline by providing greater possibility for unnecessary institutionalization. In addition, implementation of SB-43 has stalled in most counties due to lack of infrastructure, funding gaps, and opposition. This Note proposes numerous changes to SB-43 including setting clearer criteria, requiring past or present adverse effects to limit subjectivity, eliminating the hearsay exception, and incorporating community-defined programs. SB-43 has the potential to break the cycle of repeated crises including arrest and imprisonment, psychiatric hospitalization for mental illnesses, homelessness, and premature death. However, amendments are necessary for SB-43 to reach successful statewide adoption and to achieve the Bill’s life-saving potential.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-05-04
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MORE EASILY FACILITATING INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT: THE IMPACTS OF SENATE BILL 43 ON THE INTERSECTION OF MENTAL ILLNESS AND HOMELESSNESS IN CALIFORNIA

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

MORE EASILY FACILITATING INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT: THE IMPACTS OF SENATE BILL 43 ON THE INTERSECTION OF MENTAL ILLNESS AND HOMELESSNESS IN CALIFORNIA

article en

Abstract

Mental health and homelessness are two of the most prominent matters affecting California. The Legislature has attempted to combat the issues stemming from these concerns through various forms of legislation. Despite legislative efforts, the intersection between mental illness and homelessness continues to present further challenges. California Senate Bill 43 (SB-43) sets out to address the mental health crisis by modernizing California’s laws handling behavioral health, specifically for individuals living on the streets. This Note analyzes the impact of SB-43 on California’s mental health system and individuals. SB-43 expands the legal definition of “gravely disabled” to include individuals who fit the Bill’s requirements for mental health and severe substance use disorders. Additionally, SB-43 provides that expert witness statements in medical records will not be made inadmissible in court under the hearsay rule. Lastly, the Bill increases the reporting requirements to align with the new definition of “gravely disabled” to provide more clarity within the system. SB-43 poses significant problems that undermine its goals of combating rising rates of mental health issues, substance abuse, and homelessness. SB-43 risks creating a conservatorship pipeline by providing greater possibility for unnecessary institutionalization. In addition, implementation of SB-43 has stalled in most counties due to lack of infrastructure, funding gaps, and opposition. This Note proposes numerous changes to SB-43 including setting clearer criteria, requiring past or present adverse effects to limit subjectivity, eliminating the hearsay exception, and incorporating community-defined programs. SB-43 has the potential to break the cycle of repeated crises including arrest and imprisonment, psychiatric hospitalization for mental illnesses, homelessness, and premature death. However, amendments are necessary for SB-43 to reach successful statewide adoption and to achieve the Bill’s life-saving potential.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.