A nuclear phylogenomic tree of grasses (Poaceae) recovers current classification despite gene tree incongruence
Grasses (Poaceae) comprise c. 11 800 species and are central to human livelihoods and terrestrial ecosystems. Knowing their relationships and evolutionary history is key to comparative research and crop breeding. Advances in genome-scale sequencing allow for increased breadth and depth of phylogenomic analyses, making it possible to infer a new reference species tree of the family. We inferred a comprehensive species tree of grasses by combining new and published sequences for 331 nuclear genes from genome, transcriptome, target enrichment and shotgun data. Our 1153-tip tree covers 79% of grass genera (including 21 genera sequenced for the first time) and all but two small tribes. We compared it to a newly inferred 910-tip plastome tree. We recovered most of the tribes and subfamilies previously established, despite pervasive incongruence among nuclear gene trees. The early diversification of the PACMAD clade could represent a hard polytomy. Gene tree–species tree reconciliation suggests that reticulation events occurred repeatedly. Nuclear–plastome incongruence is rare, with very few cases of supported conflict. We provide a robust framework for the grass tree of life to support research on grass evolution, including modes of reticulation, and genetic diversity for sustainable agriculture.
Publication Details
- Journal
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- Primary Topic
- History of Computing Technologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- University of Missouri
- Georgia Research Alliance
- James Hutton Institute
- David and Elaine Potter Foundation
- Joint Genome Institute
- Laboratoire d'Excellence TULIP
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research
- Durham University
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
- Agricultural Research Service
- HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Natural Environment Research Council
- Australian Biological Resources Study
- Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences