The moral and cultural political economy of Central Asia: rentierism, neofeudalism and neoliberal hegemony

This chapter critically examines the nature of neoliberal economic development in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. It will discuss how rent became a dominant feature of contemporary economies, eliding the moral economic distinction between productive and unproductive activities, and earned and unearned income. Far from creating a ‘free market’ in the region, market reforms erected neofeudalism, in which the powerful propertied class extracted rent, and dominated political, legal and cultural spheres. The chapter will evaluate the neoliberalisation of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, highlighting how rent extraction has generated harmful effects. In this sense, ethics is integral to the study of economic systems. This means adopting a postdisciplinary approach to understand, explain and evaluate Central Asian economies. In light of growing discontent and protests against neoliberalism, it is important to examine how ideas, values, norms and discourses were articulated to justify, legitimise and defend market societies. International financial institutions, development agencies, philanthropic donors, non-governmental organisations and intellectuals helped to manufacture neoliberal hegemony. In critically analysing economies in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, culture, morality, the state and ideologies are as important as class, power, prices and markets.

Publication Details

Journal
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Published
2025-05-15
Primary Topic
Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The moral and cultural political economy of Central Asia: rentierism, neofeudalism and neoliberal hegemony

Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
article

The moral and cultural political economy of Central Asia: rentierism, neofeudalism and neoliberal hegemony

article en

Abstract

This chapter critically examines the nature of neoliberal economic development in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. It will discuss how rent became a dominant feature of contemporary economies, eliding the moral economic distinction between productive and unproductive activities, and earned and unearned income. Far from creating a ‘free market’ in the region, market reforms erected neofeudalism, in which the powerful propertied class extracted rent, and dominated political, legal and cultural spheres. The chapter will evaluate the neoliberalisation of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, highlighting how rent extraction has generated harmful effects. In this sense, ethics is integral to the study of economic systems. This means adopting a postdisciplinary approach to understand, explain and evaluate Central Asian economies. In light of growing discontent and protests against neoliberalism, it is important to examine how ideas, values, norms and discourses were articulated to justify, legitimise and defend market societies. International financial institutions, development agencies, philanthropic donors, non-governmental organisations and intellectuals helped to manufacture neoliberal hegemony. In critically analysing economies in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, culture, morality, the state and ideologies are as important as class, power, prices and markets.

Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The moral and cultural political economy of Central Asia: rentierism, neofeudalism and neoliberal hegemony · Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS