Lexical Search Dynamics in Taxonomic, Thematic, and Ad hoc Categories

Searching through semantic memory involves navigating across clusters of related items, but the current body of work has primarily focused on search within hierarchically structured taxonomic categories (e.g., Animals). The present work explored search behavior via the verbal fluency task in thematic categories, where relatedness is construed via complementary roles in a shared environment, and ad hoc categories, where relatedness is construed via shared service to an external goal. We found strong differences across domains within each type of category, but compared to Animals, responses in thematic and ad hoc categories had higher average phonological similarity and word frequency. Phonology-inclusive process models provided the best account of search in taxonomic categories, but overall model performance was poor for ad hoc categories. There were also important differences in the contribution of lexical sources to within and between-cluster transitions across domains. These results underscore the necessity of exploring lexical search and validating computational models in categorical domains with different compositions and types of relatedness.

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lexical Search Dynamics in Taxonomic, Thematic, and Ad hoc Categories

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Lexical Search Dynamics in Taxonomic, Thematic, and Ad hoc Categories

article en

Abstract

Searching through semantic memory involves navigating across clusters of related items, but the current body of work has primarily focused on search within hierarchically structured taxonomic categories (e.g., Animals). The present work explored search behavior via the verbal fluency task in thematic categories, where relatedness is construed via complementary roles in a shared environment, and ad hoc categories, where relatedness is construed via shared service to an external goal. We found strong differences across domains within each type of category, but compared to Animals, responses in thematic and ad hoc categories had higher average phonological similarity and word frequency. Phonology-inclusive process models provided the best account of search in taxonomic categories, but overall model performance was poor for ad hoc categories. There were also important differences in the contribution of lexical sources to within and between-cluster transitions across domains. These results underscore the necessity of exploring lexical search and validating computational models in categorical domains with different compositions and types of relatedness.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.