Modeling a network of beliefs surrounding parents' endorsement of COVID vaccines for children

Cognitive science offers powerful tools for addressing pressing public health needs. Here we apply the cognitive science of intuitive theories and the tools of Bayesian networks to shed light on why so few children in the US have received COVID vaccines and how we might encourage caregivers to seek out these and other life-saving vaccines for their children. 1700 US parents completed 13 belief scales on a range of topics likely to influence their endorsement of pediatric COVID vaccines. We deployed structure learning techniques to develop a cognitive model of the relationships among beliefs and their influence on endorsement of vaccines for children, which accounted for 70% of the variance in participants' beliefs in a held-out testing split. Model-based simulations suggested that educational interventions focused on the effectiveness of COVID vaccines for supporting individual and community health may be most effective in increasing uptake of the COVID vaccine for children.

Publication Details

Journal
eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling a network of beliefs surrounding parents' endorsement of COVID vaccines for children

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Modeling a network of beliefs surrounding parents' endorsement of COVID vaccines for children

article en

Abstract

Cognitive science offers powerful tools for addressing pressing public health needs. Here we apply the cognitive science of intuitive theories and the tools of Bayesian networks to shed light on why so few children in the US have received COVID vaccines and how we might encourage caregivers to seek out these and other life-saving vaccines for their children. 1700 US parents completed 13 belief scales on a range of topics likely to influence their endorsement of pediatric COVID vaccines. We deployed structure learning techniques to develop a cognitive model of the relationships among beliefs and their influence on endorsement of vaccines for children, which accounted for 70% of the variance in participants' beliefs in a held-out testing split. Model-based simulations suggested that educational interventions focused on the effectiveness of COVID vaccines for supporting individual and community health may be most effective in increasing uptake of the COVID vaccine for children.

eScholarship (California Digital Library)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.