LLMs-based Healthcare Conversational Agents: How do Users Understand and Adapt to the Moral Risks?

This study focuses on large language models-based healthcare conversational agents (LLMs-based HCAs). By using a three-stage mixed method and integrating the Moral Foundations Theory and the Coping Model of User Adaptation, it explores users' perceptions of moral risks, adaptation mechanisms, and the importance ranking of risk factors. The research aims to fill the gaps in existing studies, provide a theoretical and empirical basis for designing more ethically adaptable LLMs-based HCAs, and promote the safe and effective application of this technology in the healthcare field.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLMs-based Healthcare Conversational Agents: How do Users Understand and Adapt to the Moral Risks?

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

LLMs-based Healthcare Conversational Agents: How do Users Understand and Adapt to the Moral Risks?

article en

Abstract

This study focuses on large language models-based healthcare conversational agents (LLMs-based HCAs). By using a three-stage mixed method and integrating the Moral Foundations Theory and the Coping Model of User Adaptation, it explores users' perceptions of moral risks, adaptation mechanisms, and the importance ranking of risk factors. The research aims to fill the gaps in existing studies, provide a theoretical and empirical basis for designing more ethically adaptable LLMs-based HCAs, and promote the safe and effective application of this technology in the healthcare field.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Shanghai International Studies University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.