Magnetoencephalography brain biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: an ongoing study based on the BioFIND dataset

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is widely used to study neurodegenerative disorders, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD). AD is linked to amyloid-beta and tau protein formation, which disrupts brain anatomical and functional networks, leading to memory and cognitive impairments. Due to its noninvasive nature and excellent temporal resolution, MEG is valuable for examining functional changes in the AD brain. We evaluated a pipeline, based on nested cross-validation with Monte-Carlo replications, with MEG-derived sensors and source-based spectral features to discriminate healthy controls (HC) versus mild cognitive impairment (MCI) brain activity features. We also compared the effectiveness of combining MEG and MRI features extracted for 324 participants (158 MCI, 166 HC) in the BioFIND dataset. A robust selection of brain source activity biomarkers was implemented through five independently tested inverse solutions, including a linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beamformer and exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA). Several machine learning classifiers were also evaluated, including Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Logistic Regression with L1 penalty (GLMNET). Initial results showed that combining MRI features with source-based MEG features yielded the best performance based exclusively on spectral features (Acc=76.31±1.47%) using the GLMNET classifier. MEG features alone, particularly those extracted from LCMV and eLORETA analyses, demonstrated good performance (Acc=74.77±1.57%), surpassing MRI- and sensor-based analyses using an SVM classifier (Acc=72.74±1.34% and Acc=69.29±1.68% respectively). However, ongoing more advanced analyses relying on features extracted from LCMV and eLORETA and derived functional connectivity solutions (coherence - COH, imaginary COH - iCOH, wPLI, AEC, EIC) have surpassed these and previous benchmarks for the BioFIND dataset (Acc=94.91±0.01%, F1=94.63±0.01%, MCC=94.96±0.01% for MEGMAG-LCMV-wPLI; Acc=93.29±0.01%, F1=93.14±0.01%, MCC=93.30±0.01% for MEGMAG-LCMV-EIC; Acc=92.16±0.01%, F1=92.16±0.01%, MCC=93.30±0.01% for MEGGRAD-LCMV-EIC), while using a similar pipeline. Our findings highlight the potential of using MEG signals to find MCI biomarkers, supporting critical early intervention. They also provide evidence on potential "best" approaches to analysing magneto-electroencephalography-based brain activity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University)
Published
2024-10-30
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Magnetoencephalography brain biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: an ongoing study based on the BioFIND dataset

Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University)
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Magnetoencephalography brain biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease: an ongoing study based on the BioFIND dataset

article en

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is widely used to study neurodegenerative disorders, particularly Alzheimer's disease (AD). AD is linked to amyloid-beta and tau protein formation, which disrupts brain anatomical and functional networks, leading to memory and cognitive impairments. Due to its noninvasive nature and excellent temporal resolution, MEG is valuable for examining functional changes in the AD brain. We evaluated a pipeline, based on nested cross-validation with Monte-Carlo replications, with MEG-derived sensors and source-based spectral features to discriminate healthy controls (HC) versus mild cognitive impairment (MCI) brain activity features. We also compared the effectiveness of combining MEG and MRI features extracted for 324 participants (158 MCI, 166 HC) in the BioFIND dataset. A robust selection of brain source activity biomarkers was implemented through five independently tested inverse solutions, including a linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV) beamformer and exact low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (eLORETA). Several machine learning classifiers were also evaluated, including Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Logistic Regression with L1 penalty (GLMNET). Initial results showed that combining MRI features with source-based MEG features yielded the best performance based exclusively on spectral features (Acc=76.31±1.47%) using the GLMNET classifier. MEG features alone, particularly those extracted from LCMV and eLORETA analyses, demonstrated good performance (Acc=74.77±1.57%), surpassing MRI- and sensor-based analyses using an SVM classifier (Acc=72.74±1.34% and Acc=69.29±1.68% respectively). However, ongoing more advanced analyses relying on features extracted from LCMV and eLORETA and derived functional connectivity solutions (coherence - COH, imaginary COH - iCOH, wPLI, AEC, EIC) have surpassed these and previous benchmarks for the BioFIND dataset (Acc=94.91±0.01%, F1=94.63±0.01%, MCC=94.96±0.01% for MEGMAG-LCMV-wPLI; Acc=93.29±0.01%, F1=93.14±0.01%, MCC=93.30±0.01% for MEGMAG-LCMV-EIC; Acc=92.16±0.01%, F1=92.16±0.01%, MCC=93.30±0.01% for MEGGRAD-LCMV-EIC), while using a similar pipeline. Our findings highlight the potential of using MEG signals to find MCI biomarkers, supporting critical early intervention. They also provide evidence on potential "best" approaches to analysing magneto-electroencephalography-based brain activity.

Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University)
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia (MY), Intel (United States) (US), University of Calgary (CA), Translational Research Informatics Center (Japan) (JP), Department of Physics, Mathematics and Informatics (BY), Computing Center (RU), Institute of Informatics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
University of Glasgow, Universität Regensburg
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.