La esterilización forzada y la percepción de la violación de derechos humanos de los estudiantes de derecho Puno, Perú

The World Medical Association has strongly condemned the practice of forced and coerced sterilisation, as a form of violence that causes serious harm to physical and mental health, as well as representing a clear violation of human rights. In this context, the present research aims to identify the perceived factors in the human rights violation of forced sterilisation from the perspective of law students at the UniversidadPrivada San Carlos (UPSC) in Puno, Peru. This study, with an explanatory design, involved 110 law students, 46.4% of whom were female and 53.6% were male. The results of the multiple linear regression analysis revealed that restrictions to the application of medical ethics (β = 0.498; P<0.01), restrictions to the right to autonomy (β = 0.308; P<0.05) and restrictions to the guarantee of public health (β = 0.150; P<0.001) werethe predictors of human rights violations due to forced sterilisation. The findings of this analysis have important implications for policy-making and medical practice.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Violence, Education, and Gender Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

La esterilización forzada y la percepción de la violación de derechos humanos de los estudiantes de derecho Puno, Perú

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Violence, Education, and Gender Studies
article

La esterilización forzada y la percepción de la violación de derechos humanos de los estudiantes de derecho Puno, Perú

article en

Abstract

The World Medical Association has strongly condemned the practice of forced and coerced sterilisation, as a form of violence that causes serious harm to physical and mental health, as well as representing a clear violation of human rights. In this context, the present research aims to identify the perceived factors in the human rights violation of forced sterilisation from the perspective of law students at the UniversidadPrivada San Carlos (UPSC) in Puno, Peru. This study, with an explanatory design, involved 110 law students, 46.4% of whom were female and 53.6% were male. The results of the multiple linear regression analysis revealed that restrictions to the application of medical ethics (β = 0.498; P<0.01), restrictions to the right to autonomy (β = 0.308; P<0.05) and restrictions to the guarantee of public health (β = 0.150; P<0.001) werethe predictors of human rights violations due to forced sterilisation. The findings of this analysis have important implications for policy-making and medical practice.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Violence, Education, and Gender Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.