Kant on the Feeling of Certainty

This paper explores Kant’s account of certainty, examining whether – and to what extent – it can be interpreted as a feeling of the human soul in his philosophy. I argue that, for Kant, certainty can be understood as a feeling only if it is properly framed within his epistemology of assent. To support this claim, I analyze Kant’s engagement with two key figures of the German Enlightenment – Georg Friedrich Meier and Christian August Crusius – who influenced his early reflections on certainty. After outlining Meier’s and Crusius’ views, I show how Kant develops his own epistemic account of certainty, broadly identifying it with the necessity of holding-to-be-true. According to Kant, certainty must be understood in two distinct but related ways: as the expression of the highest epistemic status of our beliefs and as the feeling of conviction that accompanies the act of truth-acceptance. This dual understanding of certainty not only clarifies the peculiarities of Kant’s position in relation to his predecessors but also sheds light on key interpretative issues within his epistemic theory of assent.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kant on the Feeling of Certainty

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Kant on the Feeling of Certainty

article en

Abstract

This paper explores Kant’s account of certainty, examining whether – and to what extent – it can be interpreted as a feeling of the human soul in his philosophy. I argue that, for Kant, certainty can be understood as a feeling only if it is properly framed within his epistemology of assent. To support this claim, I analyze Kant’s engagement with two key figures of the German Enlightenment – Georg Friedrich Meier and Christian August Crusius – who influenced his early reflections on certainty. After outlining Meier’s and Crusius’ views, I show how Kant develops his own epistemic account of certainty, broadly identifying it with the necessity of holding-to-be-true. According to Kant, certainty must be understood in two distinct but related ways: as the expression of the highest epistemic status of our beliefs and as the feeling of conviction that accompanies the act of truth-acceptance. This dual understanding of certainty not only clarifies the peculiarities of Kant’s position in relation to his predecessors but also sheds light on key interpretative issues within his epistemic theory of assent.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.