Intraocular Pressure and Cup-to-Disc Ratio Asymmetry in Diagnosing Iris Melanoma

Alan W Kong, Adrian Au, Weilin Song, Angela J Oh, Tara A McCannel Department of Ophthalmology, Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USACorrespondence: Tara A McCannel, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California Los Angeles, 100 Stein Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA, Email [email protected]: Distinguishing an iris melanoma from an iris nevus can be challenging as few clinical features other than documented growth are helpful in making the diagnosis. In this study, we compared the presenting intraocular pressure (IOP) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with iris melanoma and iris nevus.Patients and methods: This was a single-institution retrospective case series of patients treated for iris melanoma and iris nevus from January 2013 to October 2022. Thirty-nine subjects with iris melanoma and forty age-matched patients with iris nevus were included. We analyzed the difference in IOP, CDR, and diagnosis of glaucoma between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with iris melanoma and control iris nevus cohort.Results: The average IOP for eyes with iris melanoma and iris nevus was 18.8± 6.1 mmHg and 14.6± 3.5 mmHg (P< 0.001), respectively. The average CDR was 0.36± 0.27 and 0.24± 0.14 (P=0.02), respectively. The average IOP of the contralateral unaffected eye in iris melanoma patients was 16.3± 3.5 mmHg, significantly less than the affected eye (P=0.03). The average CDR of the contralateral unaffected eye in iris melanoma was 0.25± 0.15, which was trending towards being less than the affected eye (P=0.05). There was no difference in the average IOP (P=0.89) or average CDR (P=0.49) between the affected and unaffected eye in patients with iris nevus.Conclusion: We demonstrate that patients with iris melanoma are more likely to have greater IOP and CDR in the affected eye compared to the unaffected eye, and a diagnosis of unilateral glaucoma than eyes with iris nevus. Patients with iris melanoma had greater IOP asymmetry between the affected and unaffected eye. Therefore, IOP and CDR asymmetry may suggest a diagnosis of iris melanoma.Keywords: iris melanoma, iris nevus, secondary glaucoma, intraocular pressure, cup to disc ratio

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intraocular Pressure and Cup-to-Disc Ratio Asymmetry in Diagnosing Iris Melanoma

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
article

Intraocular Pressure and Cup-to-Disc Ratio Asymmetry in Diagnosing Iris Melanoma

article en

Abstract

Alan W Kong, Adrian Au, Weilin Song, Angela J Oh, Tara A McCannel Department of Ophthalmology, Stein Eye Institute, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USACorrespondence: Tara A McCannel, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California Los Angeles, 100 Stein Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA, Email [email protected]: Distinguishing an iris melanoma from an iris nevus can be challenging as few clinical features other than documented growth are helpful in making the diagnosis. In this study, we compared the presenting intraocular pressure (IOP) and cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with iris melanoma and iris nevus.Patients and methods: This was a single-institution retrospective case series of patients treated for iris melanoma and iris nevus from January 2013 to October 2022. Thirty-nine subjects with iris melanoma and forty age-matched patients with iris nevus were included. We analyzed the difference in IOP, CDR, and diagnosis of glaucoma between affected and unaffected eyes in patients with iris melanoma and control iris nevus cohort.Results: The average IOP for eyes with iris melanoma and iris nevus was 18.8± 6.1 mmHg and 14.6± 3.5 mmHg (P< 0.001), respectively. The average CDR was 0.36± 0.27 and 0.24± 0.14 (P=0.02), respectively. The average IOP of the contralateral unaffected eye in iris melanoma patients was 16.3± 3.5 mmHg, significantly less than the affected eye (P=0.03). The average CDR of the contralateral unaffected eye in iris melanoma was 0.25± 0.15, which was trending towards being less than the affected eye (P=0.05). There was no difference in the average IOP (P=0.89) or average CDR (P=0.49) between the affected and unaffected eye in patients with iris nevus.Conclusion: We demonstrate that patients with iris melanoma are more likely to have greater IOP and CDR in the affected eye compared to the unaffected eye, and a diagnosis of unilateral glaucoma than eyes with iris nevus. Patients with iris melanoma had greater IOP asymmetry between the affected and unaffected eye. Therefore, IOP and CDR asymmetry may suggest a diagnosis of iris melanoma.Keywords: iris melanoma, iris nevus, secondary glaucoma, intraocular pressure, cup to disc ratio

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Ocular Oncology and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.