Healthcare Personnel Experiences With Health Literacy Sensitivity in Relation to Work Satisfaction and Stress: A Qualitative Study

Malene Nerbøvik Stavdal,1,2 Marie Hamilton Larsen,3 Astrid Klopstad Wahl,1 Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne,4 Anners Lerdal,1,2 Caryl L Gay,2,5 Christine Råheim Borge1– 3 1Department of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; 2Research Department, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 3Department of Postgraduate Studies, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway; 4Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division for Health Services, Oslo, Norway; 5Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USACorrespondence: Malene Nerbøvik Stavdal, Department of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway, P.O. Box 1111 Blindern, Oslo, 0317, Norway, Tel +47 40223099, Email [email protected]: To qualitatively explore healthcare personnel’s (HCP) experiences with health literacy sensitivity in relation to work satisfaction and stress. Being HL sensitive means that HCP have adequate knowledge, skills, and attitudes to follow up on patients’ HL needs.Methods: Four focus group interviews were conducted with 30 hCP from a medium-sized general hospital in Oslo, Norway. We used inductive thematic analysis developed by Braun & Clark. NVivo v12 software assisted data analysis.Results: Three main themes were identified: (1) HCP experiences with HL (2) HCP experience barriers with HL sensitivity, and (3) HCP collaboration and communication are essential for HL. Variability in HL understanding among HCP may lead to challenges in providing patient-centered care. Factors such as heavy workloads, cultural barriers, and organizational limitations hinder HL sensitivity and can cause frustration and stress among HCP.Conclusion: Targeted interventions and organizational support are essential to address HCP’s obstacles with HL sensitivity. Utilizing improved communication techniques and HL tools may help reduce stress and frustration.Practice Implications: To optimize HL sensitivity, it is imperative to prioritize HCP needs. Organizations should strive to facilitate HL in a way that does not impose additional stress on HCP.Keywords: health literacy, health literacy sensitivity, health literacy responsiveness, hospital, work satisfaction, work stress

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-03-01
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Healthcare Personnel Experiences With Health Literacy Sensitivity in Relation to Work Satisfaction and Stress: A Qualitative Study

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Healthcare Personnel Experiences With Health Literacy Sensitivity in Relation to Work Satisfaction and Stress: A Qualitative Study

article en

Abstract

Malene Nerbøvik Stavdal,1,2 Marie Hamilton Larsen,3 Astrid Klopstad Wahl,1 Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne,4 Anners Lerdal,1,2 Caryl L Gay,2,5 Christine Råheim Borge1– 3 1Department of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; 2Research Department, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Oslo, Norway; 3Department of Postgraduate Studies, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway; 4Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Division for Health Services, Oslo, Norway; 5Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USACorrespondence: Malene Nerbøvik Stavdal, Department of Public Health and Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway, P.O. Box 1111 Blindern, Oslo, 0317, Norway, Tel +47 40223099, Email [email protected]: To qualitatively explore healthcare personnel’s (HCP) experiences with health literacy sensitivity in relation to work satisfaction and stress. Being HL sensitive means that HCP have adequate knowledge, skills, and attitudes to follow up on patients’ HL needs.Methods: Four focus group interviews were conducted with 30 hCP from a medium-sized general hospital in Oslo, Norway. We used inductive thematic analysis developed by Braun & Clark. NVivo v12 software assisted data analysis.Results: Three main themes were identified: (1) HCP experiences with HL (2) HCP experience barriers with HL sensitivity, and (3) HCP collaboration and communication are essential for HL. Variability in HL understanding among HCP may lead to challenges in providing patient-centered care. Factors such as heavy workloads, cultural barriers, and organizational limitations hinder HL sensitivity and can cause frustration and stress among HCP.Conclusion: Targeted interventions and organizational support are essential to address HCP’s obstacles with HL sensitivity. Utilizing improved communication techniques and HL tools may help reduce stress and frustration.Practice Implications: To optimize HL sensitivity, it is imperative to prioritize HCP needs. Organizations should strive to facilitate HL in a way that does not impose additional stress on HCP.Keywords: health literacy, health literacy sensitivity, health literacy responsiveness, hospital, work satisfaction, work stress

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.