Hedging in Monetary Diplomacy : Japan’s Selective Engagement with RMB Internationalization

This thesis examines why Japan has signed a Bilateral Swap Agreement (BSA) with China in 2018 despite its broader reluctance to support renminbi (RMB) internationalization. The case seems contradictory given Japan’s historical alignment with U.S. led financial governance and its caution towards Chinese led regional initiatives. By utilizing neoclassical realist theory, the thesis argues that Japan’s decision reflects a broader hedging strategy aimed at risk mitigation while preserving strategic autonomy by reducing over reliance on both the U.S. and China. By using process tracing, the thesis has investigated two causal mechanisms: (1) Japan’s growing concern over dependence on U.S. led financial governance, and (2) its parallel engagement with both China and the U.S. to avoid full alignment with either. Empirical evidence is drawn from official documents, policy statements, and expert assessments. Although all findings were not conclusive, the empirical evidence strongly suggests that Japan’s BSA with China fits into a broader pattern of strategic hedging. This thesis contributes to International Political Economy by applying hedging theory into the realm of monetary diplomacy and providing insight into how middle powers respond to financial multipolarity

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hedging in Monetary Diplomacy : Japan’s Selective Engagement with RMB Internationalization

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
article

Hedging in Monetary Diplomacy : Japan’s Selective Engagement with RMB Internationalization

article en

Abstract

This thesis examines why Japan has signed a Bilateral Swap Agreement (BSA) with China in 2018 despite its broader reluctance to support renminbi (RMB) internationalization. The case seems contradictory given Japan’s historical alignment with U.S. led financial governance and its caution towards Chinese led regional initiatives. By utilizing neoclassical realist theory, the thesis argues that Japan’s decision reflects a broader hedging strategy aimed at risk mitigation while preserving strategic autonomy by reducing over reliance on both the U.S. and China. By using process tracing, the thesis has investigated two causal mechanisms: (1) Japan’s growing concern over dependence on U.S. led financial governance, and (2) its parallel engagement with both China and the U.S. to avoid full alignment with either. Empirical evidence is drawn from official documents, policy statements, and expert assessments. Although all findings were not conclusive, the empirical evidence strongly suggests that Japan’s BSA with China fits into a broader pattern of strategic hedging. This thesis contributes to International Political Economy by applying hedging theory into the realm of monetary diplomacy and providing insight into how middle powers respond to financial multipolarity

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Global Financial Crisis and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.