Extreme Poverty, Social Justice, and Human Rights: Rawls, Sen, and Wresinski

This paper explores the thought on extreme poverty and social justice of Father Joseph Wresinski (1917–1988), a Catholic priest who devoted his life to working with the very poor. To situate Wresinski within debates on social justice, comparisons are made with John Rawls and Armataya Sen. The focus is on the identification of the least advantaged and of who is responsible for implementing social justice. For Rawls, the least advantaged can be defined through their endowment of primary goods, and social justice is to be implemented through a society’s core institutions. For Sen, the aim is to expand capabilities, with a major role to be played by social institutions but also with scope for individuals and communities to contribute. The call for building alliances around the poorest in communities is strongest with Wresinski, for whom extreme poverty is a violation of human rights that, together with social exclusion, prevents the poor from fulfilling their responsibilities, leading to a lack of self-worth as the ultimate deprivation.

Publication Details

Journal
The Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Religion and Society Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extreme Poverty, Social Justice, and Human Rights: Rawls, Sen, and Wresinski

The Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University)
Religion and Society Interactions
article

Extreme Poverty, Social Justice, and Human Rights: Rawls, Sen, and Wresinski

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the thought on extreme poverty and social justice of Father Joseph Wresinski (1917–1988), a Catholic priest who devoted his life to working with the very poor. To situate Wresinski within debates on social justice, comparisons are made with John Rawls and Armataya Sen. The focus is on the identification of the least advantaged and of who is responsible for implementing social justice. For Rawls, the least advantaged can be defined through their endowment of primary goods, and social justice is to be implemented through a society’s core institutions. For Sen, the aim is to expand capabilities, with a major role to be played by social institutions but also with scope for individuals and communities to contribute. The call for building alliances around the poorest in communities is strongest with Wresinski, for whom extreme poverty is a violation of human rights that, together with social exclusion, prevents the poor from fulfilling their responsibilities, leading to a lack of self-worth as the ultimate deprivation.

The Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Religion and Society Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Extreme Poverty, Social Justice, and Human Rights: Rawls, Sen, and Wresinski · The Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS