Evaluating Hospital Procedures for Authorizing Emergency Abortion with Nadia Sawicki

Evaluating Hospital Procedures for Authorizing Emergency Abortion: All states that have banned or restricted abortion after the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health offer some exception for abortions that are medically necessary to save a patient’s life during an emergency. However, the internal procedures for reviewing and approving requests for emergency abortion vary dramatically from institution to institution. In some hospitals, the treating physician can make this judgment on their own; in others, an ethics committee must review the decision; in others, hospital counsel may impose limits on physicians’ authority to terminate pregnancy. Sawicki will offer insights as to how well each of these decision-making procedures balance patient safety, clinical standards of care, medical ethics and legal risk, with the goal of encouraging hospital attorneys and health care providers to thoughtfully select approaches that best meet their patients’ needs.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2025-03-19
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Hospital Procedures for Authorizing Emergency Abortion with Nadia Sawicki

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Evaluating Hospital Procedures for Authorizing Emergency Abortion with Nadia Sawicki

article en

Abstract

Evaluating Hospital Procedures for Authorizing Emergency Abortion: All states that have banned or restricted abortion after the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health offer some exception for abortions that are medically necessary to save a patient’s life during an emergency. However, the internal procedures for reviewing and approving requests for emergency abortion vary dramatically from institution to institution. In some hospitals, the treating physician can make this judgment on their own; in others, an ethics committee must review the decision; in others, hospital counsel may impose limits on physicians’ authority to terminate pregnancy. Sawicki will offer insights as to how well each of these decision-making procedures balance patient safety, clinical standards of care, medical ethics and legal risk, with the goal of encouraging hospital attorneys and health care providers to thoughtfully select approaches that best meet their patients’ needs.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.