Evaluating Large Language Models vs Traditional Machine Learning Models in Classifying Automotive Reports

Background. Efficient classification of mixed-format automotive reports is essential for improving scalability and operational efficiency in industries that rely heavily on diverse datasets. The complexity arises from handling structured numerical and categorical data along with unstructured text, necessitating robust and adaptable AI methods. Objectives. This study aims to evaluate and compare traditional machine learning models with large language models for classifying automotive reports, particularly addressing the challenge of data imbalance and mixed-format data types. Methods. A structured experimental design was utilized, incorporating traditional machine learning algorithms such as logistic regression, random forest, and LinearSVC, as well as advanced large language models with various prompting strategies, including retrieval-augmented generation. Data preprocessing involved text cleaning, translation, lemmatization, term frequency–inverse document frequency vectorization, and several balancing techniques, including synonym replacement methods (basic, embedding-based, and few-shot). Results. Results indicate that large language models, particularly with retrieval-augmented generation-based prompting and clear target descriptions, achieved significant improvements in classification accuracy over baseline traditional machine learning models. The best-performing scenario combined detailed label descriptions with recent retrieval-augmented generation examples, achieving up to 87% accuracy. Traditional machine learning models showed consistent performance but required extensive preprocessing and careful feature engineering. Conclusions. Large language models demonstrate substantial potential in accurately classifying automotive reports when enhanced with contextually relevant examples through retrieval-augmented generation. However, careful management of prompt complexity and the quality of historical data used for examples is essential. Future research should further investigate embedding quality and extend evaluation across different industries.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Text and Document Classification Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Large Language Models vs Traditional Machine Learning Models in Classifying Automotive Reports

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Text and Document Classification Technologies
article

Evaluating Large Language Models vs Traditional Machine Learning Models in Classifying Automotive Reports

article en

Abstract

Background. Efficient classification of mixed-format automotive reports is essential for improving scalability and operational efficiency in industries that rely heavily on diverse datasets. The complexity arises from handling structured numerical and categorical data along with unstructured text, necessitating robust and adaptable AI methods. Objectives. This study aims to evaluate and compare traditional machine learning models with large language models for classifying automotive reports, particularly addressing the challenge of data imbalance and mixed-format data types. Methods. A structured experimental design was utilized, incorporating traditional machine learning algorithms such as logistic regression, random forest, and LinearSVC, as well as advanced large language models with various prompting strategies, including retrieval-augmented generation. Data preprocessing involved text cleaning, translation, lemmatization, term frequency–inverse document frequency vectorization, and several balancing techniques, including synonym replacement methods (basic, embedding-based, and few-shot). Results. Results indicate that large language models, particularly with retrieval-augmented generation-based prompting and clear target descriptions, achieved significant improvements in classification accuracy over baseline traditional machine learning models. The best-performing scenario combined detailed label descriptions with recent retrieval-augmented generation examples, achieving up to 87% accuracy. Traditional machine learning models showed consistent performance but required extensive preprocessing and careful feature engineering. Conclusions. Large language models demonstrate substantial potential in accurately classifying automotive reports when enhanced with contextually relevant examples through retrieval-augmented generation. However, careful management of prompt complexity and the quality of historical data used for examples is essential. Future research should further investigate embedding quality and extend evaluation across different industries.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Text and Document Classification Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Large Language Models vs Traditional Machine Learning Models in Classifying Automotive Reports · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS