Enfoque Metodológico para la Evaluación de Impacto de los y las Egresadas en el Entorno: un Estudio de Caso

This article presents a methodological proposal for evaluating the impact of graduates from higher education institutions, based on a case study at a Colombian university. The Graduate Impact Index (GII) was used to measure the university's contribution in four key components: comprehensive training, development of interpersonal skills, social mobility, and improvement of quality of life. The evaluation considers not only the academic impact but also a sociocultural perspective, recognizing the diversity of contexts of the graduates, particularly those in situations of social vulnerability. Surveys were conducted with 956 graduates between 2015 and 2022, employing a simple random sampling method. The results show that the GII reached 72% of the expected value (1), with interpersonal skills and perceptions of university training being determining factors, scoring higher. The challenges of conducting contextualized educational evaluations are discussed, particularly in environments with social, cultural, and economic diversity, and how higher education can act as an agent of social mobility and well-being.

Publication Details

Journal
Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Higher Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enfoque Metodológico para la Evaluación de Impacto de los y las Egresadas en el Entorno: un Estudio de Caso

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Higher Education and Sustainability
article

Enfoque Metodológico para la Evaluación de Impacto de los y las Egresadas en el Entorno: un Estudio de Caso

article en

Abstract

This article presents a methodological proposal for evaluating the impact of graduates from higher education institutions, based on a case study at a Colombian university. The Graduate Impact Index (GII) was used to measure the university's contribution in four key components: comprehensive training, development of interpersonal skills, social mobility, and improvement of quality of life. The evaluation considers not only the academic impact but also a sociocultural perspective, recognizing the diversity of contexts of the graduates, particularly those in situations of social vulnerability. Surveys were conducted with 956 graduates between 2015 and 2022, employing a simple random sampling method. The results show that the GII reached 72% of the expected value (1), with interpersonal skills and perceptions of university training being determining factors, scoring higher. The challenges of conducting contextualized educational evaluations are discussed, particularly in environments with social, cultural, and economic diversity, and how higher education can act as an agent of social mobility and well-being.

Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Higher Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.