The Effect of Targeted Incentives on Response Rates and Representativeness: Evidence From the Next Steps Age 32 Survey

This paper analyses the effect on response rate and non-response bias of tailoring the level of monetary incentives offered to participants in a longitudinal study, depending on sample members’ response propensity. Specifically, we test whether offering higher value incentives to prior wave non-respondents (and lower value incentives to prior wave respondents) would lead to overall higher response rates and lower non-response bias, compared to offering to all sample members the same monetary incentive. In order to test these hypotheses, we use large-scale experimental data from the Next Steps Age 32 survey. Next Steps is a longitudinal cohort study, following the lives of approximately 16,000 participants born in 1989-90. We find that offering higher incentive to prior wave non-respondents did not significantly increase response. We also do not find support for targeted monetary incentives being particularly effective at boosting response amongst particular population subgroups. The use of targeted incentives has to date been relatively rare, particularly in the UK context, but in this study the approach was not found to be successful.

Publication Details

Journal
UCL Discovery (University College London)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Targeted Incentives on Response Rates and Representativeness: Evidence From the Next Steps Age 32 Survey

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
article

The Effect of Targeted Incentives on Response Rates and Representativeness: Evidence From the Next Steps Age 32 Survey

article en

Abstract

This paper analyses the effect on response rate and non-response bias of tailoring the level of monetary incentives offered to participants in a longitudinal study, depending on sample members’ response propensity. Specifically, we test whether offering higher value incentives to prior wave non-respondents (and lower value incentives to prior wave respondents) would lead to overall higher response rates and lower non-response bias, compared to offering to all sample members the same monetary incentive. In order to test these hypotheses, we use large-scale experimental data from the Next Steps Age 32 survey. Next Steps is a longitudinal cohort study, following the lives of approximately 16,000 participants born in 1989-90. We find that offering higher incentive to prior wave non-respondents did not significantly increase response. We also do not find support for targeted monetary incentives being particularly effective at boosting response amongst particular population subgroups. The use of targeted incentives has to date been relatively rare, particularly in the UK context, but in this study the approach was not found to be successful.

UCL Discovery (University College London)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Effect of Targeted Incentives on Response Rates and Representativeness: Evidence From the Next Steps Age 32 Survey · UCL Discovery (University College London) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS