Dual-Criterion Dose Finding Designs for Phase I Clinical Trials

The primary objective of Phase I oncology trials is to assess the safety and tolerability of novel therapeutics. Conventional dose escalation methods identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). However, as cancer therapies have evolved from chemotherapy to targeted therapies, these traditional methods have become problematic. Many targeted therapies rarely produce DLT and are administered over multiple cycles, potentially resulting in the accumulation of lower-grade toxicities, which can lead to intolerance, such as dose reduction or interruption. To address this issue, we proposed dual-criterion designs that find the MTD based on both DLT and non-DLT-caused intolerance. These include a model-based design and model-assisted design that allow real-time decision making in the presence of pending data due to long event assessment windows. We then extend this dual-criterion approach by incorporating efficacy to determine the optimal biological dose under a model-assisted design. Compared to DLT-based methods, our approaches exhibit superior operating characteristics when intolerance is the primary driver for determining the MTD and comparable operating characteristics when DLT is the primary driver.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dual-Criterion Dose Finding Designs for Phase I Clinical Trials

Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center)
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Dual-Criterion Dose Finding Designs for Phase I Clinical Trials

article en

Abstract

The primary objective of Phase I oncology trials is to assess the safety and tolerability of novel therapeutics. Conventional dose escalation methods identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). However, as cancer therapies have evolved from chemotherapy to targeted therapies, these traditional methods have become problematic. Many targeted therapies rarely produce DLT and are administered over multiple cycles, potentially resulting in the accumulation of lower-grade toxicities, which can lead to intolerance, such as dose reduction or interruption. To address this issue, we proposed dual-criterion designs that find the MTD based on both DLT and non-DLT-caused intolerance. These include a model-based design and model-assisted design that allow real-time decision making in the presence of pending data due to long event assessment windows. We then extend this dual-criterion approach by incorporating efficacy to determine the optimal biological dose under a model-assisted design. Compared to DLT-based methods, our approaches exhibit superior operating characteristics when intolerance is the primary driver for determining the MTD and comparable operating characteristics when DLT is the primary driver.

Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.