D. 41.1.36 (Iul. 13 dig.) e D. 12.1.18 pr. (Ulp. 7 disp.): tra causa traditionis e negotium contrahere in Giuliano

The study deals with the category of negotium in Salvius Iulianus. In this regard, the author examines D. 41.1.36 (Iul. 13 dig.) and D. 12.1.18 pr. (Ulp. 7 disp.), very well-known texts, concerning the topic of the causa traditionis, in which it is discussed whether the case of someone who has given a sum of money with the intention of donating to someone who has rather received it with the intention of borrowing should be considered a donation or a loan. The author excludes that the two texts and in particular D. 41.1.36 could bring arguments in support of the thesis that Julian developed a concept of negotium as an objective relationship between two distinct patrimonies, without any consideration of the will of the parties. On the contrary, from the few sure information that can be drawn from Ulpian’s text, it is clear that in the assessment of the case and particularly on the existence of a causa donandi, Julian relied on a reconstructive process that looked very carefully at the will of the parties involved.

Publication Details

Journal
Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.)
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Classical Studies and Legal History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

D. 41.1.36 (Iul. 13 dig.) e D. 12.1.18 pr. (Ulp. 7 disp.): tra causa traditionis e negotium contrahere in Giuliano

Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.)
Classical Studies and Legal History
article

D. 41.1.36 (Iul. 13 dig.) e D. 12.1.18 pr. (Ulp. 7 disp.): tra causa traditionis e negotium contrahere in Giuliano

article en

Abstract

The study deals with the category of negotium in Salvius Iulianus. In this regard, the author examines D. 41.1.36 (Iul. 13 dig.) and D. 12.1.18 pr. (Ulp. 7 disp.), very well-known texts, concerning the topic of the causa traditionis, in which it is discussed whether the case of someone who has given a sum of money with the intention of donating to someone who has rather received it with the intention of borrowing should be considered a donation or a loan. The author excludes that the two texts and in particular D. 41.1.36 could bring arguments in support of the thesis that Julian developed a concept of negotium as an objective relationship between two distinct patrimonies, without any consideration of the will of the parties. On the contrary, from the few sure information that can be drawn from Ulpian’s text, it is clear that in the assessment of the case and particularly on the existence of a causa donandi, Julian relied on a reconstructive process that looked very carefully at the will of the parties involved.

Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Classical Studies and Legal History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.