DIGITAL FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS: DENIAL, EMBARRASSMENT OR ENGAGEMENT FOR IS RESEARCHERS?

In this provocation we argue that although the IS discipline espouses multiple epistemologies, we mythologize digital technology and this undermines our epistemic capabilities for open critical inquiry into its socially destructive potential. While negative effects from the digital colonization of everyday life continue to intensify, IS researchers seem only capable of apprehending the potential benefits of digital technologies. We conjecture this inability to apprehend its antihuman potentials is rooted in digital false consciousness. As a social science discipline that aims to advance knowledge about digital technologies, IS researchers must critically reflect on our relationship to technology if we are to play a role in protecting humanity from its destructive potentials. In this provocation we will first define digital false consciousness then raise six critical questions to stimulate debate and reflection.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Published
2025-06-18
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIGITAL FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS: DENIAL, EMBARRASSMENT OR ENGAGEMENT FOR IS RESEARCHERS?

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

DIGITAL FALSE CONSCIOUSNESS: DENIAL, EMBARRASSMENT OR ENGAGEMENT FOR IS RESEARCHERS?

article en

Abstract

In this provocation we argue that although the IS discipline espouses multiple epistemologies, we mythologize digital technology and this undermines our epistemic capabilities for open critical inquiry into its socially destructive potential. While negative effects from the digital colonization of everyday life continue to intensify, IS researchers seem only capable of apprehending the potential benefits of digital technologies. We conjecture this inability to apprehend its antihuman potentials is rooted in digital false consciousness. As a social science discipline that aims to advance knowledge about digital technologies, IS researchers must critically reflect on our relationship to technology if we are to play a role in protecting humanity from its destructive potentials. In this provocation we will first define digital false consciousness then raise six critical questions to stimulate debate and reflection.

Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Institut Universitaire de France (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.