Dyslexia-friendly typography in practice : A combined literature review and typographic analysis of printed materials

The aim for this study is to investigate which typographic solutions are considered dyslexia-friendly and how these are applied in printed materials. The study is based on an inclusive design perspective as well as theories of gestalt principles of perception and color theory. A mixed-methods approach consisting of a literature review, a typographic analysis of six easy-to-read books, and an established style guide was used. The result shows that sans serif typefaces, larger font sizes (at least 12-14 pt), increased letter and word spacing, line spacing of 1.4-1.5, and softer contrast improves readability. However, the analysis reveals that practical application rarely follows these recommendations, especially in the literature for adults. The study identifies a difference between theory and practice and emphasizes a need for conscious design choices to increase inclusion. The results from the study sets the foundation for the design project Scriptura magazine.

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dyslexia-friendly typography in practice : A combined literature review and typographic analysis of printed materials

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Dyslexia-friendly typography in practice : A combined literature review and typographic analysis of printed materials

article en

Abstract

The aim for this study is to investigate which typographic solutions are considered dyslexia-friendly and how these are applied in printed materials. The study is based on an inclusive design perspective as well as theories of gestalt principles of perception and color theory. A mixed-methods approach consisting of a literature review, a typographic analysis of six easy-to-read books, and an established style guide was used. The result shows that sans serif typefaces, larger font sizes (at least 12-14 pt), increased letter and word spacing, line spacing of 1.4-1.5, and softer contrast improves readability. However, the analysis reveals that practical application rarely follows these recommendations, especially in the literature for adults. The study identifies a difference between theory and practice and emphasizes a need for conscious design choices to increase inclusion. The results from the study sets the foundation for the design project Scriptura magazine.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dyslexia-friendly typography in practice : A combined literature review and typographic analysis of printed materials · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS