Demographic and Psychological Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Comparative Analysis of Fully Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Populations in Babol, Iran

Background and purpose: Vaccine hesitancy during epidemics poses significant challenges to healthcare systems. Despite the availability of vaccines, some individuals refuse vaccination, delaying disease control and exacerbating the health, economic, and psychological consequences. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Babol, Iran. Materials and methods: In a cross-sectional analytical study, 570 individuals aged 18 years and older and under urban family physician coverage were evaluated during a two-month period (August–September 2022). Participants were divided into two groups: 285 vaccine-hesitant individuals (mean age: 37 years) and 285 fully vaccinated individuals (three doses, mean age: 42 years). Data were collected using a standardized questionnaire assessing demographic, social, psychological, and behavioral factors. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, Shapiro-Wilk test, and Mann-Whitney U test, were performed using SPSS version 26. Logistic regression was applied to adjust for potential confounding variables. Results: Univariate analysis revealed significant associations between vaccine hesitancy and age (P=0.000), marital status (P=0.017), education level (P=0.000), and income (P=0.003). Hesitancy was also linked to a history of physical (P=0.007) or mental illness (P=0.004), and prior COVID-19 infection (P=0.002). No significant associations were observed with perceived health status (P=0.280), family history of COVID-19 (P=0.232), or health anxiety (P=0.500). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for confounding variables, showed significant associations between vaccine hesitancy and perceived risk (Adjusted OR =1.78; 95% CI: 1.68–1.90), trust (Adjusted OR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.77–1.95), social responsibility (Adjusted OR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.78–1.97), barriers (Adjusted OR = 2.10; 95% CI: 2.01–2.20), and perceived cost-benefit (Adjusted OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 2.23–2.59). Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was more prevalent among younger, single individuals with lower levels of education and income. It was associated with reduced risk perception, low trust in healthcare systems, negative attitudes toward vaccination, and environmental barriers, but not associated with perceived health, family history of COVID-19, or health anxiety. Targeted interventions addressing demographic and attitudinal factors are essential for improving vaccine uptake.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Demographic and Psychological Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Comparative Analysis of Fully Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Populations in Babol, Iran

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Demographic and Psychological Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Comparative Analysis of Fully Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Populations in Babol, Iran

article en

Abstract

Background and purpose: Vaccine hesitancy during epidemics poses significant challenges to healthcare systems. Despite the availability of vaccines, some individuals refuse vaccination, delaying disease control and exacerbating the health, economic, and psychological consequences. This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Babol, Iran. Materials and methods: In a cross-sectional analytical study, 570 individuals aged 18 years and older and under urban family physician coverage were evaluated during a two-month period (August–September 2022). Participants were divided into two groups: 285 vaccine-hesitant individuals (mean age: 37 years) and 285 fully vaccinated individuals (three doses, mean age: 42 years). Data were collected using a standardized questionnaire assessing demographic, social, psychological, and behavioral factors. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, Shapiro-Wilk test, and Mann-Whitney U test, were performed using SPSS version 26. Logistic regression was applied to adjust for potential confounding variables. Results: Univariate analysis revealed significant associations between vaccine hesitancy and age (P=0.000), marital status (P=0.017), education level (P=0.000), and income (P=0.003). Hesitancy was also linked to a history of physical (P=0.007) or mental illness (P=0.004), and prior COVID-19 infection (P=0.002). No significant associations were observed with perceived health status (P=0.280), family history of COVID-19 (P=0.232), or health anxiety (P=0.500). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for confounding variables, showed significant associations between vaccine hesitancy and perceived risk (Adjusted OR =1.78; 95% CI: 1.68–1.90), trust (Adjusted OR = 1.86; 95% CI: 1.77–1.95), social responsibility (Adjusted OR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.78–1.97), barriers (Adjusted OR = 2.10; 95% CI: 2.01–2.20), and perceived cost-benefit (Adjusted OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 2.23–2.59). Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was more prevalent among younger, single individuals with lower levels of education and income. It was associated with reduced risk perception, low trust in healthcare systems, negative attitudes toward vaccination, and environmental barriers, but not associated with perceived health, family history of COVID-19, or health anxiety. Targeted interventions addressing demographic and attitudinal factors are essential for improving vaccine uptake.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.