Consumer Perspectives on Selective Sustainability: Inequities in Recycling Access and Corporate Accountability of Multinational Beverage Company. : A Comparative Analysis of Recycling Infrastructure and Corporate Responsibility in Global West vs. Glo

This study examines disparities in recycling accessibility, revealing that systemic inequities, such as infrastructure gaps and economic disparities that significantly influence consumer participation. Through surveys, geospatial mapping, and case studies across Germany, Sweden, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kanya and Indonesia, we expose how multinational beverage giants like CocaCola and PepsiCo uphold a double standard. In affluent markets, these multinational companies sleek recycling systems like Germany’s Pfand scheme and recover 98% of bottles, while in the Global South, where single-use plastic floods streets and rivers, and as a result consumers face broken promises. In regions like Jakarta or Nairobi, corporate sustainability campaigns often fail to address local challenges, including limited bin availability and low wages for informal waste pickers, resulting in high rates of plastic pollution. Yet hope emerges from grassroots resistance for example, Indonesia’s "Trash Banks," where plastic are trades for rice, resulting in achieving 68% participation by centering dignity over charity. This research demands accountability by binding global laws to fund equitable infrastructure, fair wages for informal workers, and sustainability strategies co-designed with marginalized communities. Until then, recycling will be remaining as a privilege for the few, and not a right for all.

Publication Details

Journal
DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer Perspectives on Selective Sustainability: Inequities in Recycling Access and Corporate Accountability of Multinational Beverage Company. : A Comparative Analysis of Recycling Infrastructure and Corporate Responsibility in Global West vs. Glo

DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Consumer Perspectives on Selective Sustainability: Inequities in Recycling Access and Corporate Accountability of Multinational Beverage Company. : A Comparative Analysis of Recycling Infrastructure and Corporate Responsibility in Global West vs. Glo

article en

Abstract

This study examines disparities in recycling accessibility, revealing that systemic inequities, such as infrastructure gaps and economic disparities that significantly influence consumer participation. Through surveys, geospatial mapping, and case studies across Germany, Sweden, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kanya and Indonesia, we expose how multinational beverage giants like CocaCola and PepsiCo uphold a double standard. In affluent markets, these multinational companies sleek recycling systems like Germany’s Pfand scheme and recover 98% of bottles, while in the Global South, where single-use plastic floods streets and rivers, and as a result consumers face broken promises. In regions like Jakarta or Nairobi, corporate sustainability campaigns often fail to address local challenges, including limited bin availability and low wages for informal waste pickers, resulting in high rates of plastic pollution. Yet hope emerges from grassroots resistance for example, Indonesia’s "Trash Banks," where plastic are trades for rice, resulting in achieving 68% participation by centering dignity over charity. This research demands accountability by binding global laws to fund equitable infrastructure, fair wages for informal workers, and sustainability strategies co-designed with marginalized communities. Until then, recycling will be remaining as a privilege for the few, and not a right for all.

DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consumer Perspectives on Selective Sustainability: Inequities in Recycling Access and Corporate Accountability of Multinational Beverage Company. : A Comparative Analysis of Recycling Infrastructure and Corporate Responsibility in Global West vs. Glo · DiVA at Umeå University (Umeå University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS