Chess Not Checkers: A Contemporary Analysis on Judicial Retirement and Lingering Justices in the Modern U.S. Supreme Court

In an era where the Court is particularly partisan, Justices choosing to stay on longer due to these motivators is lowering the legitimacy the Court has with the general public. First, partisan effects and interests are explored in regard to how the Court has gotten partisan and the effect that has on judicial retirement. Then, interest groups and their effect on judicial retirement is looked into. Next, it is shown why judicial retirement is significant, and the factor that these external forces play into it is explained. Finally, some recommendations for change regarding the High Court, since there is reform needed in order to preserve the legitimacy of the Court during a time where it is becoming lower and lower.

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chess Not Checkers: A Contemporary Analysis on Judicial Retirement and Lingering Justices in the Modern U.S. Supreme Court

Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York)
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

Chess Not Checkers: A Contemporary Analysis on Judicial Retirement and Lingering Justices in the Modern U.S. Supreme Court

article en

Abstract

In an era where the Court is particularly partisan, Justices choosing to stay on longer due to these motivators is lowering the legitimacy the Court has with the general public. First, partisan effects and interests are explored in regard to how the Court has gotten partisan and the effect that has on judicial retirement. Then, interest groups and their effect on judicial retirement is looked into. Next, it is shown why judicial retirement is significant, and the factor that these external forces play into it is explained. Finally, some recommendations for change regarding the High Court, since there is reform needed in order to preserve the legitimacy of the Court during a time where it is becoming lower and lower.

Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Chess Not Checkers: A Contemporary Analysis on Judicial Retirement and Lingering Justices in the Modern U.S. Supreme Court · Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS