Comparing smash performance and technique between elite male and female international players

<p dir="ltr">Performance of the badminton smash plays a crucial role in success during competition. Differences in performance and technique between genders is of interest to players/coaches with respect to appropriate training intensity and understanding performance expectations during competition. Three-dimensional position data were collected for 26 male and 26 female elite international badminton players (world ranking: male = 59 ± 36, female = 54 ± 24) performing the smash. Male players compared to female players performed smashes with greater shuttlecock speed (98.7 vs 78.5 m×s-1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), racket head speed (63.3 vs. 51.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and shuttlecock angle below the horizontal (13.3° vs. 7.3°; <i>p</i> < 0.001) with the latter likely due to higher contact heights (2.90 vs 2.46 m; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and jump heights (53.6 vs 14.5 cm; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Female players typically used a ‘kick-through’ rather than a ‘two-footed jump’ movement. The majority of differences in technique, assessed via statistical parametric mapping, occurred during the backswing phase, where male players adopted a more flexed, less laterally flexed (to non-racket-arm side) and counter-rotated trunk positions. Male players held their racket arm further back during the backswing (negative shoulder plane of elevation angle), and the elbow joint was held in a more extended position at the start of the backswing and in a more flexed position just prior to contact. No differences were found at the wrist joint. This study provides normative performance and technique data for elite male and female international players, highlighting current differences between genders which may inform training and competition preparation.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-05-14
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing smash performance and technique between elite male and female international players

Figshare
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparing smash performance and technique between elite male and female international players

article en

Abstract

<p dir="ltr">Performance of the badminton smash plays a crucial role in success during competition. Differences in performance and technique between genders is of interest to players/coaches with respect to appropriate training intensity and understanding performance expectations during competition. Three-dimensional position data were collected for 26 male and 26 female elite international badminton players (world ranking: male = 59 ± 36, female = 54 ± 24) performing the smash. Male players compared to female players performed smashes with greater shuttlecock speed (98.7 vs 78.5 m×s-1; <i>p</i> < 0.001), racket head speed (63.3 vs. 51.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and shuttlecock angle below the horizontal (13.3° vs. 7.3°; <i>p</i> < 0.001) with the latter likely due to higher contact heights (2.90 vs 2.46 m; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and jump heights (53.6 vs 14.5 cm; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Female players typically used a ‘kick-through’ rather than a ‘two-footed jump’ movement. The majority of differences in technique, assessed via statistical parametric mapping, occurred during the backswing phase, where male players adopted a more flexed, less laterally flexed (to non-racket-arm side) and counter-rotated trunk positions. Male players held their racket arm further back during the backswing (negative shoulder plane of elevation angle), and the elbow joint was held in a more extended position at the start of the backswing and in a more flexed position just prior to contact. No differences were found at the wrist joint. This study provides normative performance and technique data for elite male and female international players, highlighting current differences between genders which may inform training and competition preparation.

Figshare
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.