Corrective feedback are IS… : Written corrective feedback on written grammatical mistakes at upper secondary school in Sweden

The aim of this study is to explore (1) what written corrective feedback strategies are used to address students' written mistakes, particularly grammatical mistakes, and (2) what common grammatical mistakes are made by students at Swedish upper secondary schools. Eight teachers in central Sweden were asked to participate in this study, and two decided to take part. The teachers then had to gather confirmation from their students to submit texts produced by students on which the teachers had given written corrective feedback. The student texts, along with the written corrective feedback, were analysed and categorised using descriptive categorical data. The result shows that the corrective feedback strategy used is based on what the teacher prefers. In this study, one seemed to prefer direct corrective feedback and the other metalinguistic feedback. Both teachers only used unfocused direct corrective feedback on the grammatical mistakes, resulting in most, if not all, grammatical mistakes receiving corrective feedback. Furthermore, the most common grammatical mistakes marked in the texts were not fully in line with previous research, as only one aspect was common: subject-verb agreement. The other two most common ones were lack of commas and capitalisation, which would need more research to understand why.

Publication Details

Journal
DiVA (Mälardalen University College)
Published
2025-01-01
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corrective feedback are IS… : Written corrective feedback on written grammatical mistakes at upper secondary school in Sweden

DiVA (Mälardalen University College)
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Corrective feedback are IS… : Written corrective feedback on written grammatical mistakes at upper secondary school in Sweden

article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to explore (1) what written corrective feedback strategies are used to address students' written mistakes, particularly grammatical mistakes, and (2) what common grammatical mistakes are made by students at Swedish upper secondary schools. Eight teachers in central Sweden were asked to participate in this study, and two decided to take part. The teachers then had to gather confirmation from their students to submit texts produced by students on which the teachers had given written corrective feedback. The student texts, along with the written corrective feedback, were analysed and categorised using descriptive categorical data. The result shows that the corrective feedback strategy used is based on what the teacher prefers. In this study, one seemed to prefer direct corrective feedback and the other metalinguistic feedback. Both teachers only used unfocused direct corrective feedback on the grammatical mistakes, resulting in most, if not all, grammatical mistakes receiving corrective feedback. Furthermore, the most common grammatical mistakes marked in the texts were not fully in line with previous research, as only one aspect was common: subject-verb agreement. The other two most common ones were lack of commas and capitalisation, which would need more research to understand why.

DiVA (Mälardalen University College)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.